From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65EB88A907 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:49:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 56BDF243A8 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:49:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:49:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8B36842CDC; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:49:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:49:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Content-Language: en-US To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com, sebastian@debianfan.de References: <999FE921-85FE-4A38-9792-17A679EEA2D5@debianfan.de> From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <999FE921-85FE-4A38-9792-17A679EEA2D5@debianfan.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.041 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Aug 2022 10:25:16 +0200 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Upgrade or New blank installation X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 10:49:24 -0000 Hi, you can upgrade of course, please follow this guide: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0 It's a good idea to have working backups nonetheless, upgrading is not a minor change after all ;) If you only have a single host, reinstalling is also rather painless, but apart from backing up the guests, you might also want to backup other configuration in /etc/pve or /etc in general. Best Regards, Fiona Am 03.08.22 um 16:07 schrieb sebastian@debianfan.de: > Hi, > > I have an proxmox 6 host - end of live :-( > > Better backup all the kvm and reinstalll the host with the new proxmox 7 or upgrade the existing host? > > Tnx > > Sebastian