From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A1C70A92 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 16:06:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 006511211D for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 16:06:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.merit.unu.edu (webmail.merit.unu.edu [192.87.143.6]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 679481210C for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 16:06:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.87.143.100] (ws100.merit.unu.edu [192.87.143.100]) by mail.merit.unu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDDBF8126A0F1 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:59:33 +0200 (CEST) To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <834518548.61504.1629388709014.JavaMail.zimbra@zimbra.panservice.it> From: mj Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:59:33 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <834518548.61504.1629388709014.JavaMail.zimbra@zimbra.panservice.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.923 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -2.332 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PBS 2.0 with pve 6.4 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 14:06:40 -0000 Hi, Not sure I understand what you're asking. We are using pve 6.3-6 with pbs 2.0-9. Is there an issue with pbs 2.x combined with pve 6.x? It seems to work here? MJ On 19/08/2021 17:58, Fabrizio Cuseo wrote: > Hello. > Someone is using proxmox backup server 2.X with the last PVE 6.4 ? > If yes, someone have installed on PVE 6.4, backup client 2.X using repository: > "deb http://download.proxmox.com/debian/pbs-client buster main " ? > > I would like to have LVM file restore, but now i don't want to upgrade my cluster. > > Regards, Fabrizio > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >