From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB7D4749FB for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 21:10:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BF79822C68 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 21:10:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [IPv6:2001:1418:10:5::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0965922C5F for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 21:10:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10) id 241B93C7B52; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 21:10:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from news by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1nwTfN-0004eR-Jj for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 21:06:01 +0200 From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 18:41:19 +0200 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: References: <2853D8F3-A64B-43A6-B923-306902AA9949@wolfspyre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1654109642 15954 192.168.1.24 (1 Jun 2022 18:54:02 GMT) To: Wolf Noble X-Mailer: tin/2.4.4-20191224 ("Millburn") (Linux/5.4.0-113-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: <2853D8F3-A64B-43A6-B923-306902AA9949@wolfspyre.com>; from SmartGate on Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 21:06:01PM +0200 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.191 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Experimenting with bond on a non-LACP switch... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 19:10:47 -0000 Mandi! Wolf Noble In chel di` si favelave... > I was condensing several (i emit traffic on one interface but listen on all bond members) into ???active-passive??? > this: > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBonding > does a better job explaining the different modes??? > hope that helps? Mmmhhhh... seems to me roughly the same documentation of debian and PVE wiki, and at least to me does not solve the 'confusion' about the 'active-passive' term... Sorry... -- Si dice che se fai girare un cd di installazione di Windows al contrario nel lettore cd si sentono messaggi satanici. Questo è niente: fallo andare nel verso giusto e installa Windows! (?)