From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAABF79D56 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:34:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A16261D17B for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:34:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A39921D170 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:34:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 60A494582B for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:34:50 +0200 (CEST) To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <11c22442-2494-4fc5-6622-4968b50b6966@marcobertorello.it> <651b6824-4023-2726-5d2d-8f969853e9c5@proxmox.com> <407c5765-770d-6597-c1f1-19e78723ddd8@marcobertorello.it> <4f5a8f4b-eb59-1d07-d4bf-bd1d80911b69@marcobertorello.it> <6a8822a7-f19b-c3a7-0205-0a1296fc98b5@proxmox.com> <7cc6faa3-6129-8d52-72cd-4b86419ce432@marcobertorello.it> From: Fabian Ebner Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:34:49 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7cc6faa3-6129-8d52-72cd-4b86419ce432@marcobertorello.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.703 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -2.905 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Container exceed disk size X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:34:51 -0000 Am 28.10.21 um 10:10 schrieb Bertorello, Marco: > Il 28/10/2021 10:02, Fabian Ebner ha scritto: >> Am 27.10.21 um 10:03 schrieb Bertorello, Marco: >>> Il 27/10/2021 09:55, Fabian Ebner ha scritto: >>>> >>>> I'm not able to reproduce the issue here. Could you share the output of >>>>     zpool history | grep subvol-119 >>>> ? >>> >>> sure, the output is in the attached file. >>> >> >> Thanks! So the container was migrated to another node and then >> replicated/migrated back. But in our code, the -p flag is used for zfs >> send, so properties like refquota should be preserved. Could you also >> check the history on the other node(s)? > > Yes, all containers have replica to other nodes (4 nodes cluster). This > specific container was migrated just one time (as far as I remember) to > another node and back. > > As attachment, the history on the other node. > Unfortunately, the log is as expected and I still wasn't able to reproduce the issue. Let's hope it was a one-time event, but if it happens again (and even better if you manage to get a reproducer) feel free to report it to us and/or upstream ZFS. > Best regards, > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >