From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3234380B1D for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:43:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 24E5F26C87 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:42:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 3790726C79 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:42:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 06A4C43DAC for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:42:58 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:42:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:95.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/95.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE user list References: From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.075 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.727 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [ceph.com, proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Ceph 16 upgrade warning also valid for proxmox users? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 07:43:29 -0000 On 11/18/21 19:02, Harald Leithner wrote: > Hi, > > the ceph release packages site has a big red warning not to upgrade from > earlier versions to Pacific. > > So when I haven't updated to Pacific yet, should I wait or is it safe to > upgrade for what ever reason? > > https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/pacific/ Hi, this bug is already mentioned in our upgrade guide: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Ceph_Octopus_to_Pacific#Check_if_bluestore_fsck_quick_fix_on_mount_is_disabled You can ofc run Octopus for now, if you want to play it safe and wait for a fix in Pacific (though AFAIK if that option is disabled the upgrade should be ok, but maybe i am missing something) kind regards