From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14CA01FF140 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:10:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C908783DF; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:10:12 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:56:31 +0100 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: References: X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1768495684 1576686 192.168.1.45 (15 Jan 2026 16:48:04 GMT) To: Marco Gaiarin X-Mailer: tin/2.6.4-20240224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.14.0-37-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 In-Reply-To: ; from SmartGate on Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 18:06:02PM +0100 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.454 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 1.592 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] ZFS: different upgrade level in cluster for replica and migration... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" > After upgrading to PVE8 we are in the process of upgrading pool, but we > cannot upgrade the sparring partner server because of known GRUB > compatibility. > > We have upgraded a test server, and replica works as expected, so seems that > replica (and migration) does not depend on zpool upgrade status. > > But i ask here confirmation. I try to restate hoping on feedback; current situation: Main server, UEFI/systemd-boot, done a 'zpool upgrade': root@sdpve1:~# zpool status rpool pool: rpool state: ONLINE scan: scrub repaired 0B in 00:11:24 with 0 errors on Sun Jan 11 00:35:25 2026 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ata-MTFDDAK480TDT_2112303EC385-part3 ONLINE 0 0 0 ata-MTFDDAK480TDT_2112303EC3A2-part3 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors Sparring partner server, BIOS/GRUB, NOT done a 'zpool upgrade' for the known GRUB incompatibility with the new zpool format: root@sdpve2:~# zpool status rpool pool: rpool state: ONLINE status: Some supported and requested features are not enabled on the pool. The pool can still be used, but some features are unavailable. action: Enable all features using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, the pool may no longer be accessible by software that does not support the features. See zpool-features(7) for details. scan: scrub repaired 0B in 01:02:57 with 0 errors on Sun Jan 11 01:26:58 2026 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ata-ST1000NM004A-2MN130_WRF08R4V-part3 ONLINE 0 0 0 ata-ST1000NM004A-2MN130_WRF08GWM-part3 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors replica and migration between the two server work as expected, i'm simply asking if this can be a source of trouble or i'm safe. Thanks. -- _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user