From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C32D71FF2AE
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 21:49:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3C7B838C56;
	Mon, 22 Jul 2024 21:49:37 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <d831cc53-c8d6-4fe6-a6ec-5397422cf8a3@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 21:28:32 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
References: <6aee1ef2-47f5-4d1c-8600-88cd796be6e7@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
 <mailman.628.1721675915.331.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 <mailman.629.1721676254.331.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
From: Frank Thommen <f.thommen@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
Organization: DKFZ Heidelberg, Omics IT and Data Management Core Facility
 (ODCF)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.629.1721676254.331.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.224 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] [Extern] - Re: Mapping of VLAN tags to Linux
 bridges: Is that possible?
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-user" <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

Ah, good to know. This is indeed a good incentive to migrate to PVE 8.x :-)


On 22.07.24 21:23, David der Nederlanden | ITTY via pve-user wrote:
> Hi Bastian,
> 
> This is a good way too indeed, but it has to be done on each node and be
>   exactly the same, now with SDN you can manage this from a cluster
> perspective, which is a great advancement and makes it less complex (I
> think, as we manage it per VM).
> 
> Kind regards
> David

_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user