From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BCAB6920D for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:13:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 79B601D99F for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:13:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from styx18.konzept-is.de (styx18.konzept-is.de [212.62.202.218]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id F12A41D98F for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:13:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.10.10.98] (unknown [10.10.10.98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: storm) by styx18.konzept-is.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7905D1FC3F for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:13:48 +0100 (CET) To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <20210310104731.GH3397@sv.lnf.it> <6443ecf0-5d1e-ee29-c5aa-4332b192b8bd@konzept-is.de> From: storm Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:13:50 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Three node Hyperconverged PVE+Ceph and failure domains... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:13:50 -0000 Hello Eneko, maybe I am paranoid, but I already experienced this situation when pgs are unavailable until you fix the node/osd on which the missing pg is on with replica=3 in 7 node cluster, with a failing osd on one up node and two other nodes down. Also have in mind that the cluster will be really slow when a lot of nodes fail and recovery can take a long time... So better be prepared. As admin I never want to be responsible for any dataloss. best regards and better be paranoid (always expect the worst case scenario to happen, as it will) Am 10/03/2021 um 13:35 schrieb Eneko Lacunza via pve-user: > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user