From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89891D45A for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:02:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7F09B46F1 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:02:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mxout03.lancloud.ru (mxout03.lancloud.ru [45.84.86.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 361D446DB for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:02:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from LanCloud DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mxout03.lancloud.ru 5F45E20EB461 Received: from LanCloud Received: from LanCloud Received: from LanCloud Received: from LanCloud Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 17:02:13 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE user list From: =?UTF-8?B?0KHQtdGA0LPQtdC5INCm0LDQsdC+0LvQvtCy?= X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.108 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 -0.001 Average reputation (+2) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 0.001 Informational: message has unparseable relay lines Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:02:22 -0000 Hi to all, I have the  6 node Proxmox VE cluster + Ceph installed (all node is PowerEdge R440) Need I Configure Hardware Watchdog / IPMI Fencing ? I'm a little confused do I need to do something in this direction or not? Sergey TS The best Regard ______________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >From mir@miras.org Fri Apr 15 16:16:36 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3F29D463 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:16:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B682C48B9 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:16:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.datanom.eu (mail.datanom.eu [188.166.46.182]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id EE8FE48A8 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:16:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.datanom.net (83-93-223-153-cable.dk.customer.tdc.net [83.93.223.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.datanom.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CC9D4030F for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DDD120ED6 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:56 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=miras.org; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:x-mailer:references :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:subject:to:from:from:date:date; s=dkim; t=1650032156; x=1650896157; bh=ngkAMoai5woyCgUPF36OxO9Q pbxUmTWUlIXZg8P5G+I=; b=Yl3Peg440FZZTmq8oE59boGM6p2qewl/ZwXu06vE IlBeDXjL/Qi2LTdgwKMYQL29bjFEWSXoZxh43fZDdc0IxWY8FDsD5JJr8w25DDvd LepzbUGFZcgaJMYCIplsCWNV/+xZP5lbcMCXwED8bbXRS8Oo0CXglCynDbrsEWLi GC0= X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - iredmail.datanom.net X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at iredmail.datanom.net Received: from mail.datanom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (iredmail.datanom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8hTfnZRGWXdk for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sleipner.datanom.net (unknown [192.168.2.79]) by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8281A120D96 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:57 +0200 From: Michael Rasmussen To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer Message-ID: <20220415161557.677231fd@sleipner.datanom.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0git4 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-GPG-KEY: ftp://ftp.datanom.net/pub/claws/gpg-key.txt X-Face: +UpSPFkh3^t&rI|{Ou$3/l]vjTk; D5c0k; *3p?O2c+:bV#y*0q4EWQ[Kdd2=; PR}nK Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAYAAABXAvmHAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAAZiS0dEAP8A/wD/oL2nkwAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9kKERcdBc2f4noAAAHfSURBVGje7VmxkYMwEDwYKIE6FIhc9OCUkCbcADRBSOoeRAlE9CAVcZ88HoOBEUJwwvbNKMG7Hi26uV3ZgZQS4YKVZVkAAABSSjQpKtwSdxAS2qhv2xaCIHiutm3JTiK02XyWZdPjJBMRWvTepufeCfCtvk+AlHLTc+8ECCHeNiulBCEEiYDIhiSEAEQ//C8aRqPpCHWJc1Jf6cQ+OXZ45ObPcOzDBJzl2BHlBHFxGqQCbL3jVXh44HTb9FxrDVVVQZqmEMcxxHEMaZpCVVWgtaYZo//j7rmmnw3V9z1yzjGKotnFOce+788fo4NjD2uuZbTWkOc5dF23+D1d10Ge57MnQe7EdV2vbv5VRF3XcL/f/XLitdaZa6XVFjJ1Tpc4k7e/hg23OqdrnDMnNnVO1zjGmPFm57DkV8rb7bYLSy6gKAqjU2CMQVEUywJMndM1LkkSaJpmVQRjDJqmgSRJ1p3Y1Dld4xARlVJYluVorHLOsSxLVEotXmgufyMLvubX6SPe4iF3YutYS8XdG2upuG8ClFJGwYpz/pwKlNy3Ftoaa/dEYlfckYDH42E8AaZYKu5IwJ5YS8X9rP8H9sRaKu5IwJ5YS8X9iDH6OUZmG2upuJvjtK9h7vpx+lfE9QdGLGM23Jk+0QAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/HM.xNXg7W49pAttcbLc/aDh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.858 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:16:36 -0000 --Sig_/HM.xNXg7W49pAttcbLc/aDh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 17:02:13 +0300 =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A6=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=BE= =D0=B2 wrote: >=20 > Need I Configure Hardware Watchdog / IPMI Fencing ? >=20 > I'm a little confused do I need to do something in this direction or > not? >=20 The software watchdog comes configured out of the box and with fencing etc. and works extremely well. I would bother configuring the hardware watchdog. --=20 Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen cc https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xD3C9A00E mir datanom net https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xE501F51C mir miras org https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: Keep out of the sunlight. --Sig_/HM.xNXg7W49pAttcbLc/aDh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEX3FAW1ccuO4qQUpPx3wR4EmgbmYFAmJZfh0ACgkQx3wR4Emg bmYpbgf+Id4WkkNRm3kZyu+i2NkwjAUHnQ8nIqi0cFCWV15A6Gsl1o5uB5lbzoSn kQdd2ekTXhgvkW1LlvQY3ts5WJKeCBzhN2GpkK8ZCiHxnF/o/+sLEJRWXaD96Hzr CWti9N7WlNjRURSrnMt701PABnX5Up1sgZ5tpyX7Mz0wI72K/5UEYaDBPASBWpiP KwpPzqBOFs20kqv2oUZdeqe1oy2BXbFKcjmhwPOipINvD5j4boPBYuAUPIGoLeHz WWq4r/Ozgge/MIQ5lw6ebqo36ivyYkL+VepxVldhtMhlsMTZBzbKyYQWMgHKSYbH qIDSNyVyRcZgbHZ1/I+Lja0D2GvE9w== =ii/l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/HM.xNXg7W49pAttcbLc/aDh--