From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 196528A508 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:39:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0C54823511 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:39:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:39:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id tl27so22695782ejc.1 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 22:39:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suma-informatika.hr; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc; bh=SH7XKbSrQz6029dcAPH4sIIriv5NzEKU+ESQbIofT5M=; b=Ptw5nps0TkhKJmqbnOlACvWMhFi76rdQjWDr2ZBdWZBPKNYmIeITl5LudarE/Yf+WV YeVBVFvdZsxGs3vdObhjjncQ3FAUbjDSTAS2IHydKVWA+fdIoHELR3ffEYoSdAQq/e4s VIrIWCntzK7PqwO3r6G/xY/iNgg3HEwRqYAJ8DpySt/WoX1n0kbQ1Rhs/JMGk2NVMuLf 5r7Vmi+WNFIQT0wa0D16K5h7Gnra6LTAR+MMA5sfSIJrBaRKHHwABN+YilRCGKzb5iP+ qMjX8JGsAjiZs3gMb4FvrZkTA4zZk/9HUdss2+h9sCKFCuW6vXJH4/Pessm9kF8By6yp 3QeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=SH7XKbSrQz6029dcAPH4sIIriv5NzEKU+ESQbIofT5M=; b=IqtjOAuHVMna3+SmdLcGONbBWUaSasl2QvHR+KJMLhTkCiwCWDoPLozkPG9Onih8q4 XQ96cK+QiODlX9Cia+TbaPTnde0wCvdXyeFxbSAnyrGq9Ozu9AGW4wN6vromjBYSMBw9 yCMQbRQgId+XgHivfxAgodqNMRls8fne9XRPzRg+KFP5K0FGgKdNygzOanga8g+nxcp1 26Zhj3lUgucS0Pe/H6fPUO6oP9WUFfXcuW3vKpedxTHrIjXjqGGLCqEkHp/OmzMq2KrE wO2g5pNppZOWu/7aj/vAwISPgPPdHeTO1YVrJHmkbF726XIz89bytA9nSCFufZaJTITU SEew== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo15LniUUDQqBsQqzqkhwnz8UVfwaIegr4Qp5gU+1g0iLg27jnSg 7I6fP+DkY62J0wAKT/xpI5jj7lZT9QDw3w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4RUEsOgb067WBPVt2w77/6TUxi2uS63gB2hLevXKKJmUAHKVPMTEK2a2040BvcNU1w+m+cDA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7f8b:b0:734:b422:42e7 with SMTP id qk11-20020a1709077f8b00b00734b42242e7mr15446403ejc.225.1660714764080; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 22:39:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.10.21.51] (78-1-172-109.adsl.net.t-com.hr. [78.1.172.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gf15-20020a170906e20f00b0072b1cb2818csm6260679ejb.158.2022.08.16.22.39.22 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Aug 2022 22:39:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:39:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9uxI1pIFN0aXBpxI1ldmnEhw==?= To: PVE User List References: <8678ddf7-98ef-f87b-bb16-09ad4953804e@suma-informatika.hr> <20190708201918.00ca0f22@rosa.proxmox.com> <649afeba-9626-6688-7967-3ee604eea2bb@suma-informatika.hr> In-Reply-To: <649afeba-9626-6688-7967-3ee604eea2bb@suma-informatika.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [suma-informatika.hr] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:24:05 +0200 Subject: [PVE-User] Shared SAN <> ZFS concept X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 05:39:32 -0000 Hello to all a new customer of mine has shared san storage connected to two hosts (XEN cluster at the moment). The plan is to migrate to Proxmox, but I'm using mostly ZFS concept and HA clusters w/o shared (SAN) storage , and my head point/feature  is ZFS storage replication . Now I'm wandering is there any possibility to take advantage of this SAN storage in the "ZFS world"?    I'm afraid not , but still hoping ...   I really like feature zfs-storage-repl which means that VMs can be very quckly ready on another host/cluster (w/o need for backup/restore option) But, SAN storage by itself is already redundant though ... Thank very much in advance for your opinions/advices BR Tonci srdačan pozdrav / best regards Tonči Stipičević, dipl. ing. elektr. direktor / manager SUMA Informatika d.o.o., Badalićeva 27, OIB 93926415263 Podrška / Upravljanje IT sustavima za male i srednje tvrtke Small & Medium Business IT Support / Management mob: 091 1234003 www.suma-informatika.hr