From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCFD0CE62 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 19:42:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 94D0C19897 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 19:41:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 19:41:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-99c1d03e124so843249966b.2 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:41:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692207692; x=1692812492; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:content-language:reply-to:to :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=9S4LeyIWjyYfaTTY4wZLp8TcL4vF1zZjYpDhaIGWWmQ=; b=P0W9Ie8c68hkzA6J8hBos5kXqJJkeQnTOEtHDcuSOWOnIdAS8BvNW++9pbwa38yZ2c Qp5I1yfarx7raMyYBqtHDJcahxfp1oow7N7VIprqC17pkf2O5BPevNUmEAH6aQf7Vbby mwvEe3SSqAPFKiS+XSEM0JKLx+sVtp8FqrotapUVWcwLXeKSGQCTxf7kkXfgwHR/7Wa3 ny6yFcSjNJb9QIjwM6EbhJIQiW6M8xOBxvgokc6EZqs8ARD00qiCy9ihp9elir7eezMV G9D8wMcNwuGeJ806cV2RjY18PNHd9S1bepnqWHkjfqP13+v1yVbngknG4O76gWC1EE7I sihA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692207692; x=1692812492; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:content-language:reply-to:to :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9S4LeyIWjyYfaTTY4wZLp8TcL4vF1zZjYpDhaIGWWmQ=; b=EEYJzSuUQqWa8D9GAjb7s9w/gA7fH6AyYo2rbXs1eo5brhzH3H4dVrnWQr/sCEiMGV N9K/QaO9vMcPdLEI4sbNs9Nzg4RLvG37oYiIUCH6FMY1hR8OwCq5kTmHW+d5HYLlDPEr sBpHmF0c/Xn9fsgt1QE8X6FsQIOJja1P6fnMI7tP13A3y2K+n0fgwX0A6ih6QJQh/Pln Cs+f+eAWTaHx/kTf3Xr+uSvdUDauYVOD9hB7L2u2HvQ4ojKRz1zukQDZmNUjKQbbTxvg lAPemc6oig4Q/1WKRtWQWvnpbNQQI2LYK1MEduNlkHLeKLE+iFnGe9Qt1Juag8ZFJO5U EaEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyyD7W7q/Q73nJbYJQXU1Qjlx/4v93OOn/7SZepZSaZbRwb8wpl JT5poIVvwElQFdNdw0fQagVXt9J8uac= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFunBvSqptXCMoKTcX9vB6CAokAGDu9n2SUn/iKy+P5mD0tBYH4S8L1IBO4iKyRjIwrRwbscw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8a75:b0:970:71c:df58 with SMTP id hy21-20020a1709068a7500b00970071cdf58mr1915877ejc.42.1692207692335; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:8070:a280:2d80:f217:893d:c157:4d83? ([2a02:8070:a280:2d80:f217:893d:c157:4d83]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ce11-20020a170906b24b00b0098d2f703408sm8820079ejb.118.2023.08.16.10.41.31 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <c4a037b2-f5e6-4914-af42-54108223c5d9@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 19:41:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com Content-Language: de-DE, en-US From: Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.119 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [PVE-User] Limit amount of memory used for containers / vms X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:42:09 -0000 Dear all, I was wondering if Proxmox provides a mechanism that allows to configure the memory limit a host uses to run containers or vms. In the case of a hyperconverged setup I think such a mechanism would prove beneficial in order to provide Ceph with enough memory to function properly. In the case of a forced migration it would also help the HA mechanism to distribute the containers / vms properly onto the rest of the cluster without putting too much memory pressure on the hosts. Regards, Uwe