From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D96660C7E for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:30:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 74E061C25C for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:29:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from kirkenes.lirmm.fr (kirkenes.lirmm.fr [193.49.104.30]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C83F41C246 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:29:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from bibou.lirmm.fr (bibou.lirmm.fr [194.254.113.13]) by kirkenes.lirmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3316968B for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:29:43 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lirmm.fr; s=mail; t=1606483787; bh=BjHXkVGBkuFZOPMygGshQCgry5ItIU9yjkA75Qr/jgo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lnCAeqeC+UQFb1N1NC7F9tsuzUBukoL4kAyynn1nItgAKwF9/ER5kaJ2WVIh2GOS6 TRgSpYO4dCRvrAj0j+4ijA0DRQFcV38E9cOn3G6U0piVONvC8Qf4aW6iNRgjc+eMSM iMi9EabnDSEcIBxnkQ7m1T/qVQspbUbqhPBvhhDHMErsntzocWd/5qwQ86Bsu8Q91V wz1uABSqqP67CF+DWgurlofZtknDlSdxQpmEyms5s2+sqYCrFCjAVy6soe2FmXyqIB 6m9A/D/LqPtn2x0ZTPQObVjIfW85k+1Bl4PGZQOwk0oZCt7vxYyMsuwm8DoX/5Qr0Y QwPOlXij3bhQg== To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <4545c7f5-9b50-2f0a-952a-cc532ad01b13@gmail.com> <32d89f84-29a7-90c4-deed-1a3638c99098@proxmox.com> <791fa674-2701-e451-dcbe-b358f5b5298b@gmail.com> From: Jean-Luc Oms Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:29:42 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <791fa674-2701-e451-dcbe-b358f5b5298b@gmail.com> Content-Language: fr X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.333 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 0.001 Very Good reputation (+4) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [lirmm.fr] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] [update available] Re: Caution: ceph-mon service does not start after today's updates X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 13:30:19 -0000 Le 27/11/2020 à 14:18, Lindsay Mathieson a écrit : > On 27/11/2020 5:35 am, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: >> Hi Uwe and Lindsay, >> >> ceph 14.2.15-pve2 is now available, it includes fixes for the ordering >> restraints of the various ceph service unit files[0], besides that there >> where zero actual code changes. > > > Thanks! Just updated and did a rolling reboot on our cluster. All > servers/services came up perfectly, no issues. You have cleared the ceph health error  ? > > > Gonna test that Octopus upgrade next :) > > > CXheers, > -- Jean-Luc Oms /STI-ReseauX - LIRMM - CNRS/UM/ +33 4 67 41 85 93 / +33 6 32 01 04 17