From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E920675237 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 01:01:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D3663F138 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 01:01:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A72F2F12E for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 01:01:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id y21-20020a7bc1950000b02902161fccabf1so9837064wmi.2 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 16:01:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S1gLTbRQcO/rMEzCgB5QirMnZ5sIMOQ6I+x/UWVT+Qc=; b=mTDYVt9SKVaYFnYmgNIEyAdmDJRfmrGqRprwG1KVZ+NlzrdxIeBiPzPpDeU1WuMlDb tD1wZP3pbtZCJMElGamiXr9K4kzsApBll6klYqlkmjLYmsms4RN3u8EA4sR+nb/31HwY YcCbW4wE7My1b3PDWJ1dKRs3ThTJUXiZAnK64n+qEN/uVSzZAHUHDTdTwMtfbKhxqJ3r xmZkcOHwFz415t//ihxSzoEAOXoUXnqayXqGgmP+62mPfXWM3gD/j+pfIofGeU4TVh4L ZKZCvC5JXIWFfnDB2rrMbFMtMzDopdZ0D/kXJYIsxaqBN/YdUjjB/a4lu9az6lXDr4GO 38+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S1gLTbRQcO/rMEzCgB5QirMnZ5sIMOQ6I+x/UWVT+Qc=; b=UgLJ8Qo6LF6TKf+LLLQ4LmCXPno4HX9WNheao0B1iT76c+daO18in9pGuHs6GpjDWW 4hoKD/7jBNUEQQ31GTWXBBRpDtHAkWcgI6XBOJHEgZvCwLtGf7nd3nFAZup0UGGJYN2b WwpEyVxXhtMjBZ9mMQaUhDOa0hAhawtjH3SQsbGxAKCgZmSmFQra4/+1JvHQkILHPqX6 YBwX0GJQOor1pZtlywiq7wFR0Q3NrFKFu1hVsg7JSgNl+DP6/kzwUAMihHgh4bCComgm BWATyO1Ba/NX4oYExqwXJWt3TemqrresggpvFNGKyOrAPI/mH40GKUJD+J1iXJrwUNIJ jO6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5309wbL0GEZ8tzHaVoEQO6oUyBhCcOx4mRl1LzZ0D5uIFV6XbO1F XoqupgqFOVSFICEU0iKGdV4nuTYPz2MiOEel X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxo6yqqMeQ/KLj8V9IPy7HkMGngWzdcxfVt+ozCvGvWBhcXfKJApJrqm2aW4yPk4oHGujFfnQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7701:: with SMTP id t1mr2678975wmi.139.1626044472321; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 16:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a0a:1580:0:1::100c? (ovpn1.odiso.net. [2a0a:1580:2000::3f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f7sm5699549wru.11.2021.07.11.16.01.11 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 11 Jul 2021 16:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: alexandre derumier To: Proxmox VE user list Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 01:01:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <10e5b75a-0e2b-ed80-f188-38a9be4a5a14@tuxis.nl> References: <8242aca652161e867154eba4f9b5a65fa2ee9298.camel@odiso.com> <10e5b75a-0e2b-ed80-f188-38a9be4a5a14@tuxis.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.787 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record T_SPF_TEMPERROR 0.01 SPF: test of record failed (temperror) Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox questions/features X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2021 23:01:54 -0000 Le vendredi 09 juillet 2021 à 10:16 +0200, Mark Schouten a écrit : > Maybe easier to use the metric-server-service for that? it's more than we don't have some values currently, like vm real host cpu usage. (including vhost-net process for example), or real host memory usage (for windows, when ballonning is enabled, we don't see the zero filled memory by windows, so reserved on the host). My patches to get values from cgroups are already applied, but they are not yet exposed in pvestatd.  I would like also to improve pve-ha-manager vm migration based on the hosts load too. I just need time to rework on this ^_^