From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3A9F6116C for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 04:24:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C226E2200F for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 04:23:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6603622001 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 04:23:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id k11so5725287pgq.2 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 19:23:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=Ye1BoUo06Fvs94hVPEdE7wE8tEGqSVK8+HI/rkpV1vw=; b=eyFUTH3M3/lxvE6/dQppW56+vqQkCjj22vLZXc12dnmsosR4k5r+w26iwxYna+0h0n 4lmQgVXYjPX+AUX+ycBBIfX9CBZX1J51boL+b7Zh9WC08bjvxLIz4FIdAfCYK2iiR/eE G7nlNdkdpQF2xHEKr2GMH6s7L0ATAu/J3LsFl3EVjSJL0vGez5iF/0jzP86m3IBBqpux vbKZwTtISkUKYZmlIt/MrKw4WEYauNxiaW6U/wa/Z+fxbX5bYeZZi3cF/+2fJgGgiJU1 QKmfAM89PQsRPS8SgUtqI90ohkaOpT8o1IO2d974zt8l0/rDojx/MqIVCuXplkR3mPvo 6DBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=Ye1BoUo06Fvs94hVPEdE7wE8tEGqSVK8+HI/rkpV1vw=; b=foN4R+Nmokvns8S3g33ldAX5Bdf1kmOueeV7wKjo6aQ1LBG5CaA40ltPyOL0IjayT9 sDtZ5WyLzS2nmZ7xYeLarkcol/Thqc+iu9vWbTbWQdzP78C+4l2iXcAd4Jw3dydVUaVb WsVlGYNQZSvqwBRrFIyZuSTLkou65J3IGlPlYLjKbuRk2w0jDKAaoBt9a6GOazUGkZqd jGMNgHJEuUtH5+yZV7L+TzQHVbcBlBMLbOu0tsNRUK7qLN9uozzyG2tuc55r23OkWvnD H3tILbL1QVWcmp48ao413A8BLvO+fk5BDhJnbaBdS8vBtFl404y0TmHUCdkXpv0t8BYq hb6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312ZYeO5d/lE5eMGhrPAp/FsOap320dT6cy1t3ScINH1Rvgr2Ot 4U5tCl2cu9PAWTWL6q0f08Vdq1dGfJLR/Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1nltRuKMcYCKPYFWbX7K8qr6BJfh+AXFt/YxB74ktG8+K3+Nl78qmqA3+Q3EnSk+4BwSO4g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4b02:: with SMTP id lx2mr14303762pjb.49.1606533806473; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 19:23:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q29sm9321058pfg.146.2020.11.27.19.23.24 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 19:23:25 -0800 (PST) To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <930e1177-6137-aa49-718c-04f4fa74e975@lirmm.fr> From: Lindsay Mathieson Message-ID: Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 13:23:21 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.225 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Python problem with upgrade to proxmoxVE6.3/ CEPH Nautilus 14.2.15 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 03:24:04 -0000 On 28/11/2020 2:45 am, Marco M. Gabriel wrote: > It would be fine if anyone could test and confirm that an upgrade to > Ceph Octopus resolves the issue. Regards the dashboard not working on Proxmox 6.3 - upgrading to ceph Octopus fixed it for me. Also the dashboard looks a lot more swish :) -- Lindsay