From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02F98915FC for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 12:16:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ED2BD1B64E for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 12:15:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 4.mo575.mail-out.ovh.net (4.mo575.mail-out.ovh.net [46.105.59.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 12:15:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from player726.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.16.84]) by mo575.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2404825CEF for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from riminilug.it (host-79-7-69-158.business.telecomitalia.it [79.7.69.158]) (Authenticated sender: piviul@riminilug.it) by player726.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A00D62E483BCB for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:58:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-98R002bafd13a4-d2aa-4235-9409-465a69b03d55, 07BA5DC75D32E4A1A4D5E79254784DDABEE592B5) smtp.auth=piviul@riminilug.it X-OVh-ClientIp: 79.7.69.158 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 11:58:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.1.2 Content-Language: it, en-US To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: From: Piviul In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 13608752174072433057 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfedtvddgvdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefrihhvihhulhcuoehpihhvihhulhesrhhimhhinhhilhhughdrihhtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelgfeuledukeekfedvledvkeeutdekvedujefgteelgeetjeegtdetkeeuvddthfenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpjeelrdejrdeiledrudehkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhhvghlohepphhlrgihvghrjedviedrhhgrrdhovhhhrdhnvghtpdhinhgvtheptddrtddrtddrtddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpihhvihhulhesrhhimhhinhhilhhughdrihhtpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtohepphhvvgdquhhsvghrsehlihhsthhsrdhprhhogihmohigrdgtohhmpdfovfetjfhoshhtpehmohehjeeh X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 3.004 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -4.199 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:57:32 +0200 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] systemd-logind.service X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 10:16:00 -0000 On 05/09/22 12:27, Kalpesh Sejpal wrote: > Hi, > > It's better to enable features Flag nesting=1 for each LXC container with > that error. > > Please, check security conserns before changing it. > > If you can't do that then another alternative it to mask systemd-logind > service. Hi Kalpesh, thank you very much. In effect both solution seems to work. There are security risk to set nesting flag on unprivileged container? Piviul