From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6A15A061 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:12:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BFC6D34285 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:12:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0.konsec.net (hbase53.h.konsec.com [88.99.94.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:12:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kolab.konsec.com (unknown [10.21.1.190]) by mx0.konsec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D3686D1F1; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:03:31 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=konsec.com; s=201809; t=1687860211; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WPVjio/IDlT6gjvhJGWHeJQPrgjG6r3siFlyzSkI7X4=; b=WwdfuLVO5zl8JjP0GSAjfqBLnO/Xvakbn+YoivXaiaJiNwiJgX3x+RyregaPduRucde0d3 80ydWVWR3ryQ+VflZNia+SeiJHWyrOt/1BinqFbVgSyvDSvV+i1lpiNDtmtwISqR94dIrw 1ODKEvegkw+SreWZPvEYet/uYSONWVBNYy8NN8Qnq7mTMFaILR6zWw/YytOfHI9UvIpfBS spqrE+faVufGSJkL0cKx+A2Swv8GjIe9hSyiVEZVay9XPfUapX3bP6intsBltTBOnUOdss 2EfE/en6aswFJ7jA72Z4mL+5XTX0f/DiazFXnux5s0Doamk/Jd93Z4cVGWA9GQ== Sender: martin.konold@konsec.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:03:31 +0200 From: "Konold, Martin" To: Proxmox VE user list Reply-To: martin.konold@konsec.com In-Reply-To: References: <7b0bdc0d-fa2e-3a9b-00b4-7f177748af57@iba-group.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: martin.konold@konsec.com Organization: KONSEC GmbH Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.080 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Email that uses ascii formatting dividers and possible spam tricks SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com, iba-worldwide.com, konsec.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Intel RST / VROC support in latest Proxmox? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:12:49 -0000 Hi, if you love your data do not go for hw raid but ZFS instead. Proxmox has native support for ZFS. --- Regards ppa. Martin Konold -- Martin Konold - Prokurist, CTO KONSEC GmbH -=E2=81=A0 make things real Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 23690 Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Andreas Mack Im K=C3=B6ller 3, 70794 Filderstadt, Germany On 2023-06-27 10:33, Aaron Lauterer wrote: > AFAIK, VROC has two variants, actual HW RAID and so-called fake RAID. > If it is the fake RAID variant, it will be ignored and the single > disks should be shown in the installer. >=20 > If it is an actual HW RAID, it should only show a single block device > for each RAID to the OS. >=20 > In consumer boards, the chances of VROC being the fake RAID variant > are quite high. >=20 > But why not ZFS with mirrored (maybe even multiple mirrored disk, RAID=20 > 10 like)? > In case of a disk failure, the handling of it is much nicer and if you > can hotplug the disks, you don't even need to power down the machine. >=20 >=20 > Cheers, > Aaron >=20 > On 6/27/23 09:50, Philippe Andersson wrote: >> Hello List, >>=20 >> Quick question. I'm currently looking into upgrading my home Proxmox >> server (using PC components meant for the home market, for cost >> reasons), and getting a "real" hardware RAID proposition under these >> conditions turns out to be quite an ordeal. Intel RST/VROC seems to be >> the only available option. >>=20 >> Can anyone on this list please confirm whether these technologies are >> supported by the latest Proxmox VE installer/kernel ? >>=20 >> Thanks in advance. >>=20 >> Ph. A. >>=20 >> -- *Philippe Andersson* >> Unix System Administrator >> IBA Particle Therapy | >> Tel: +32-10-475.983 >> Fax: +32-10-487.707 >> eMail: pan@iba-group.com >> >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Disclaimer | Use of IBA=20 >> e-communication >>=20 >> The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended=20 >> solely for the recipient (s) named above. This communication is=20 >> intended to be and to remain confidential and may be protected by=20 >> intellectual property rights. Any use of the information contained=20 >> herein (including but not limited to, total or partial reproduction,=20 >> communication or distribution of any form) by persons other than the=20 >> designated recipient(s) is prohibited. Please notify the sender=20 >> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and=20 >> delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be=20 >> guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Ion Beam Applications does not=20 >> accept liability for any such errors. Thank you for your cooperation. >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-user mailing list >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user