From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D348C13D for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 13:40:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8F8C821BA0 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 13:40:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 13:40:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1667043609; bh=ZGUmMEZrUgI1i/j5HeFrfS1xYog7N18cUA3B7iqL7yc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=g9jRLc+wx+2G3gjQw/C+5iSBaP8c31RPDZsd+kr71qz87cdkciOo5B+7qdobt3MJM Xap1mXKsZJ27oH3UTAL8hfxDXRItXpVBBdR1TSUPVa06tbrIgMludE4UIqe+FuKk2N dLTrCIi2bOL7Ijkw0ZLyBWN3n3UeZTHOusRiH/2lJHTY844xDzmY9YQzq6JrgS4PUz bgQek9OuUzKd+Nx7yRpB1SRn9HRgWZfiiC8WZ6RptnkkPo7+NXzx/qP8KPjmvwsfAL A1K2WoWeOEqb79rGNzI3/rtsRtIuGik/k3pK8uraJIlMtiWQunxHBcbIPyNmuMdZWl LWJv6oSV5VuxA== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from [192.168.179.90] ([89.1.197.36]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb005 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MAcpg-1ovO2T0XNI-00B4wR; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 13:40:09 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 13:40:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1 To: Proxmox VE user list , Hermann Himmelbauer References: From: Roland In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:qkUCaH6Xj9U8JT+HaJYybClybiWas+kLGpwpbqkA0FCBixIX1A7 D1qO2qsoeBIf8qDPE6AoVptF+10Kn3lA1mMrI6YxqumOwOEIWYAKOcVGxq8Q9B30b7uo0EX RQWebk/CYPdQxvcCXCSzuCSjYQsRgoewlHra/J/7jOvd0UF27psEpbV+U6hr4hRG4YYTBFk SCzGtyYRjlGMlLu7E5YjQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:7Uhodb4hwIo=;Fff3XGYmBuHnq9DDd+vxuMfbvHn xPdgQa2LYcOYMNrDEJS1x0bmsYQQK2RNe+2vbqgxv0i51xYs+jsnzkeMIqads7H4onZ1wf/M5 S82yHhoUhngk/inBcIKUob/Q+ybD4q6VMGz2YCPikhqXYMPyf252IcxQu4gwnopJ65vtZX54d u4lgA14m/GAW53yNHeEs0CPMUUSnr3kcVSi4U4mkgmzD4xFY+DE6VIX6mudNDersrpSQ987xo dXy7VnG8Aw2T23XA5YMYcLLuTeBvbiHML5kl0m+nTQiqgf55P8j6jb3DzJ7e5+3j9+Jc23cEe CjumEeiU/uDOq1blPKg5Sl6izkgL+/veFsJpinrE4jnMHp3xf4SsmmfdOWRuNAoMVoXXCWLK1 icOV+6J7fjabceTJjQPQfeYjnDOu5KmrgPmZKtBYVTxsPiKapXFEhzdG1dVHDIA0XxpvsZ/oL uezHGIyKIyIFQMEAoINcij9AYVM9i3nfmeqWGIG7LBZV/cp+D+YStMEltZodA0Q2uTL6S37As E50rkAH+oEu9l6qMsrvdlmjp+A+Z8OXrNFfwYOJ00bYSLvrqbd9HWg/q3vEGzhTh3015OaTsM AvC3QSy7Ox24+Kqu7Cf3gvExaRnnJmLp61UeV2aLMTAVYAju5O2YAu/7b6NGhU392RIxk/es1 HAvjvDA5CX2FzbRcJLwfm9EBXLikzE3gD+PRwZpTfpTn2RbQXwcP+8eeSJGWOexmgI7vNq/7d oXBXT8WjGmcey9Z3OMR/pDFcTQMbFxZP+bVAyXcI1Zm2Zps9GJrWbs7SRRY5R/9QWyj3TJ/q+ 02/6Mg1dJzwBBJRmXg14KYolqpEu6Te0P4YtgG8QDOqk5FYvDJUWiTNT9RHrSzGD5wn4T/DTQ CRehhFflNImbFbzBhstoGVEUKempMroxgfz/E7vONVht46KCzUpiXDp+tK0mZ7xZ8anIHgSKn dNEfZZ88iC/4xx6u15hBPcf0TR4= X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.237 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox PBS: Recommended task schedules (Prune, GC, Verifiy)? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 11:40:17 -0000 >Do I have to ensure in some way that these tasks don't overlap? since proxmox gui/scheduling won't allow serialization of this tasks, i'm running them via cron/script # proxmox-backup-manager verify pve-t620_backup --ignore-verified true =2D-outdated-after 30 # pvesm prune-backups pbs_pve-t620_backup --keep-daily 31 --keep-weekly 8 --keep-monthly 6 # proxmox-backup-manager garbage-collection start pve-t620_backup regards Roland Am 29.10.22 um 12:25 schrieb Hermann Himmelbauer: > Dear Proxmox users, > I am currently configuring a PBS server. For the retention, I used the > values from the following page: > > https://pbs.proxmox.com/docs/maintenance.html > > keep-last:3, keep-daily:30, keep-weekly: 8, keep-monthly: 11, > keep-yearly:9 > > This looks like a decent retention scenario. The underlying datastore > is ZFS, approx. 40TB. > > The backups to my PBS-Server is done at night, starting at 1:00 from a > PVE-Cluster. The backup itself runs for approx. 5 hours. > > Working great, o.k. - now I need to configure the following tasks: > > - Prune > - Garbage Collection > - Verfiy > > Well, it's now really unclear to me when and how often I should do > these tasks? Do I have to ensure in some way that these tasks don't > overlap? > > Thinking in non-overlapping terms, I'd do it like this: > > - Prune: daily at 6:00 > - GC: daily at 11:00 > - Verify: daily at 15:00 > > Or is it better to simply do it like that: > > - Prune: hourly > - GC: hourly > - Verfiy: hourly > > Any hints? > > Best Regards, > Hermann > > P.S.: I think it would be a great addition to the manual to put some > recommendations / best practices there. > > > > > >