From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76B09905DE for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 13:33:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5A8411B677 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 13:33:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 13:33:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id l7so16939687pjg.5 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 04:33:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680176008; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OrDOUrLnm/ztQy0YUpRRPCVj6nhG/LOKvw3Qc3bi4gU=; b=WPeOSK1UOjVRVEqo031HqQMSQWW2pgQyJ0oJUpC8HQYWpmaCxwFkAkRV4YPMEtdZQK HO1aMnJUsXoNzLiwSDyQEDpWnzgwIMjgH0FLuTo0OnL8DwrXu/66U+DejDitzOth51+1 jg3ELgh9mkQhd9TEdbBuHWcobfZuxfEIuapf+Kne/IGL71n6QHbEjwituXPfGQMluY9G riWnCf/qY+MdwKaNIDkeGbYvNINb2FmdaDoOw0s4AmhSfmBaSJ8iu0M93B5EDp2wJsB0 ZPyOaSm9siWSjRfHmZ2bgSN2zDv418VoJCZVQtadApw9lh+Qh+9lRzbdMPThMGUvQ46E Q2xQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680176008; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OrDOUrLnm/ztQy0YUpRRPCVj6nhG/LOKvw3Qc3bi4gU=; b=LLf2XWhBQb1EbcsU60MIwL9PSKYLhF4Kl7n7zF2Vqd2td9ujO83SsJngYxX8qmhcC2 iw96Ti/KsqCs3CWy7bl79lUTeJV0dDBCKEOYeKOFre98O8taLZaQziqk1QotuY9yZxu5 iMnYzeqMAy689quw+WBYxCHBUq5O/o93b09AlTAJocGHxwTcwmOzqfJFSlUHzFXGww2n BOFOARBiG+/Kq41Ay/I4u4rW8BkUMAKg5T6OVdAorwGHTHl3OLa4HmI+PNDMGa/L/vs9 WDN63FJeOvLnbqZoe28VAiq2iiDz0rX+quUmOI1tZ8Ba5aaTkmf7qSST6gqQb9RwH43m 5tag== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9c40y/9XOH5GRrWNiClVf0Qz/rUbUMcr0yuJHJff16KHIOq6Vb2 M1jjZhdn7BjNGjAT+aach3unV4gouIkXMQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350acaXsDqeIZt2QeNne5HXkjI6NiR7nK6pWfLZvXx2nO0CtDL5Fr4KkzWgGP2dK3NGUv1a2p5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ecc4:b0:19a:9880:175f with SMTP id a4-20020a170902ecc400b0019a9880175fmr25350039plh.51.1680176008619; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 04:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.161] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f10-20020a17090274ca00b0019c2b1c4db1sm24409667plt.239.2023.03.30.04.33.27 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Mar 2023 04:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 21:33:25 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Content-Language: en-US To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <1680167828.p941isje7l.astroid@yuna.none> From: Lindsay Mathieson In-Reply-To: <1680167828.p941isje7l.astroid@yuna.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.770 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Backup Server Root Prune jobs and Namespaces X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:33:38 -0000 Ah, Thanks, overlooked that setting. It defaulted to empty (Full), which was what I wanted. On 30/03/2023 7:18 pm, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > On March 30, 2023 9:42 am, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: >> If a prune job is defined on PBS for the root, does that apply to the >> namespaces under the root as well? > depends on whether the job is configured to be recursive or not: > > --max-depth (0 - 7) > How many levels of namespaces should be operated on (0 == no recursion, empty == automatic full recursion, namespace depths reduce maximum allowed value) > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > -- Lindsay Mathieson