From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D4B162B12 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:36:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6BB082698E for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:36:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oi1-x22b.google.com (mail-oi1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 008E626985 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:36:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oi1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id s5so15111520oic.10 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:35:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wolfspyre-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to:date; bh=OzX9bXsdLrCXcaizjihQwLrwCMBhE14liB3m0qPyAP8=; b=zeIrndi+EX608ZSveevetClWvStPRlV2D01SwqBTRX0K9nXQ4EEP6lq5LAUsAs835x 8azB2LwAzNOtR/ddbMYWCtNqLSN2CoTiBcs1QotpF6MglPr1btXlagt6UD18U5dN6y33 6DHXEifZGfpaZZs8OMlwPOIzglcBF5j5p5z4rJmeY52oAsVxnObNS9Rn0jfoqNWwHtgf d30P+C3ujBVxuP80NnozD2AJNSLfIe6MOqO3yy8GaJdRVl9Wr1cHJBthAlY2OVvUtOTX yCDldjR3rhiymH/HgDX4c9rvzIabCnV0YR2CLuiexmamcRNL6aIJ8SgmFLc4vV4VeE+r Mdcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to:date; bh=OzX9bXsdLrCXcaizjihQwLrwCMBhE14liB3m0qPyAP8=; b=ZiY/NpOEa+gptD6cXwwktVZ7PkBGb73i0bdRHZ/oVZiw6r44HiHX20d1bLcy/i7+jD nCfXT2PMauT0fko3pgOnOiRhZ7ATA0INHGOgsIaVMxYVR5Rt5LqYRcG+0RavKGuM/5ke Y5vtFkUZhIM95JnB8lpEJ3p4lHc07I9la1IqIw/K/gvw2JIGSocFaS18mwmuWCwDFLZv 9Px61uXS4A4DXLSVEH+fXQlxRiCuj5C5Kxe/b9avPM260FKfrda7FA5M/u5Xt5Le1uoO htTd/4JUxRHWlOIApAN+2D3Ztkh+wrVJnspER/aVs0b6g/qdS7BD+qTPeQcqFO7EEnPD wLsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gmTjspTk0fYQxysaHK4a3xCIECZnxd0BfMsMZhzHu9h8GThKw IFnxpJf0ptf5EVYj94r8yirrWA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2bg94cEKa1ulSu/C0+seorONOR2AAJ9yaUYVeJ9OpzYd7rKBWE+RDyhGfwteje36ivwjdJQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:ecf:b0:2d4:f57b:dfc7 with SMTP id q15-20020a0568080ecf00b002d4f57bdfc7mr2343781oiv.226.1645547752497; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:35:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpclient.apple (who.wolfspaw.com. [108.221.46.19]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b16sm6087516oti.69.2022.02.22.08.35.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:35:52 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Wolf Noble Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Message-Id: References: <639da1da-5e4c-7c13-03cb-ce716cd07954@merit.unu.edu> In-Reply-To: <639da1da-5e4c-7c13-03cb-ce716cd07954@merit.unu.edu> To: Proxmox VE user list Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:35:51 -0600 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19E5225g) X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [PVE-User] 10G mesh to 40G DAC X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 16:36:00 -0000 Cool!! is there some set of consistent synthetic action-sets cluster maintainers ca= n perform to illustrate a vaguely useful performance benchmark that would fa= cilitate some objective comparable metrics? would it be valuable in cases like this? [=3D The contents of this message have been written, read, processed, erased= , sorted, sniffed, compressed, rewritten, misspelled, overcompensated, lost,= found, and most importantly delivered entirely with recycled electrons =3D]=