From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74291607C3 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 22:12:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4E441131BF for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 22:12:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from relay04.etecsa.net (relay04.etecsa.net [181.225.231.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 9E1FA131A8 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 22:12:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-gw02.enet.cu (unknown [172.29.8.32]) by relay04.etecsa.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13EBE00C1 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:05:34 -0400 (CDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nauta.cu; s=nauta; t=1599077134; bh=XkwLcMDDIQiBPCOXDod5YUiVS6PsWxnR9lzbJMu722k=; h=Date:Subject:To:From; b=jt2gRHuuAgnqJXFBiBrOfzbNVbgCGX8bKx97mzAkmMziuYbKvnS2qA7PEKwGDiArx S6SLPK7+hSRGNr7oMAvi7NRDb6s1t3d4TxAzds9d76zoo1vgGSZtHaLWB/Ezyn037C pat5+6l65BMAHVn0EBM6zP32dm2XO6euB1oDRBS8= Received: from amavis.etecsa.net (unknown [172.29.8.230]) by smtp-gw02.enet.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE8D1800060 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:05:34 -0400 (CDT) Received: from smtp.nauta.cu ([172.29.8.248]) by amavis.etecsa.net with ESMTP id 082K5YH6002654-082K5YH7002654 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:05:34 -0400 Received: from [10.65.34.170] (unknown [10.65.34.170]) by smtp.nauta.cu (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2F15D9F291 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:05:29 -0400 (CDT) Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 16:05:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pve-user@pve.proxmox.com From: Rommel Rodriguez Toirac Message-ID: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [nauta.cu, proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [PVE-User] Problem downloading repositories X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 20:12:34 -0000 Hello all; I use a little script to create a local repository by downloading the pack= ages=20 from the official site [download=2Eproxmox=2Ecom] using the debmirror appl= ication,=20 for this I use a server with Debian 10=2E5 operating system and debmirror = 1:2=2E32 This is the script: ****** #!/bin/sh : ${URLDIRE:=3Ddownload=2Eproxmox=2Ecom} : ${OUTPATH:=3D/var/www/html/repos/proxmox} : ${LOGFILE:=3D/var/log/actualiza_proxmox=2Elog} # Crear el directorio de destino si no existe=2E if [ ! -d "$OUTPATH" ] ; then mkdir -p "$OUTPATH"; fi # Inicio archivo de registro=2E cat > $LOGFILE <> $LOGFILE 2>&1 & # Fin=2E exit 0 ******* I look at the logs and the download always interrupts saying that dists/ buster/pve-no-subscription/binary-all/Packages=2Egz is missing=2E ******** Ignoring missing Release file for dists/buster/pve-no-subscription/binary-= all/ Packages=2Egz http://download=2Eproxmox=2Ecom/debian/pve/dists/buster/pve-no-subscriptio= n/ binary-all/Packages=2Egz =3D> [100%] Getting: dists/buster/pve-no-subscrip= tion/ binary-all/Packages=2Egz=2E=2E=2E #** GET http://download=2Eproxmox=2Ecom/= debian/pve/ dists/buster/pve-no-subscription/binary-all/Packages=2Egz =3D=3D> 404 Not = Found 404 Not Found Download of dists/buster/pve-no-subscription/binary-all/Packages=2Egz fail= ed:=20 404 Not Found Errors: Ignoring missing Release file for dists/buster/pve-no-subscription/binary-= all/ Packages=2Egz Download of dists/buster/pve-no-subscription/binary-all/Packages=2Egz fail= ed:=20 404 Not Found Failed to download some Package, Sources or Release files! WARNING: releasing 1 pending lock=2E=2E=2E ********* At http://download=2Eproxmox=2Ecom/debian/pve/dists/buster/pve-no-subscrip= tion/=20 actually there is no binary-all/Packages What am I doing wrong?=20 How can I fix this and download the full repository from Debian 10 using= =20 debmirror? Thanks in advance=2E --=20 Rommel Rodriguez Toirac rommelrt@nauta=2Ecu >From tobias.guth@ecos.de Thu Sep 3 12:45:49 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 342E660AD4 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:45:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1F5F717EF5 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:45:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.ecos.de (mail.ecos.de [94.130.18.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 8487E17EDD for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:45:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecos.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FF934CBC for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:36:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rz.ecos.de Received: from mail.ecos.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ecos.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IJ0p0MXmM06P for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:36:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from srvmail3.i.ecos.de (unknown [10.133.7.2]) by mail.ecos.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1A00329FA for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:36:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by srvmail3.i.ecos.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA941343627; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:36:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from srvmail3.i.ecos.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srvmail3.i.ecos.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id P4ZeXhhudMZJ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:36:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.85.200.169]) by srvmail3.i.ecos.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA2601343626 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:36:34 +0200 (CEST) To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com From: Tobias Guth Autocrypt: addr=tobias.guth@ecos.de; keydata= mDMEXp6ztRYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAbjIZYx6k89LXf67gxLZjcd2ld5csqA1f5WoqToLqX3S0 OFRvYmlhcyBHdXRoIC0gRUNPUyBUZWNobm9sb2d5IEdtYkggPHRvYmlhcy5ndXRoQGVjb3Mu ZGU+iJYEExYIAD4WIQTYNkxoo1/U4UJ7clo1fSgp4cs8xQUCXp6ztQIbAwUJAeFD6wULCQgH AgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRA1fSgp4cs8xQeqAQCz/GuSCST67D5Vx1BJ5Yt32LAd 3rsXJENKMDxIdSLL5gD/b+C2aioUDvAyI124o7Zl+wc6NQU2dHtMyzbE21AdsA24OARenrO1 EgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdA7q33j3Jz9ujaROs7xl3CQU3KbK0hwJNk5ASye6DlEk8DAQgHiH4E GBYIACYWIQTYNkxoo1/U4UJ7clo1fSgp4cs8xQUCXp6ztQIbDAUJAeFD6wAKCRA1fSgp4cs8 xdopAQCE7PnDnSnqAD1keMQK3XeKQq9y8+WVWQUM1jstr54shwD+N5A3VlTnGTVa7Cei5QKa rw3pnpsXb/qBpoi13ec9SQQ= Message-ID: <88f905da-f9cc-4636-3f54-c653f48b78c4@ecos.de> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:36:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms030502070403070008090608" X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [PVE-User] User permissions for some hosts X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 10:45:49 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms030502070403070008090608 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------45FD80F12CFF87D52BE7B3BF" Content-Language: en-US This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------45FD80F12CFF87D52BE7B3BF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have posted some issue on the pve forum regarding user permissions on some pve hosts. (https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/permission-set-for-specific-hosts.7513= 8/) but no answer so far. I try to give some usergroup the permission to create/delete/modify virtual machines on just 2 hosts of our cluster. But I have no luck to configure the right permissions that this group can not modify or delete virtual machines on the hosts. There is no namespace like /vms/nodes or /vms/node1, just /vms. Is there any way to configure this ? And one more question. Was exatly does the propagade option with permissions ? Does it mean to propagade given permissions through out the cluster ? Regards iBot --------------45FD80F12CFF87D52BE7B3BF-- --------------ms030502070403070008090608--