From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D97896A0D5 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 18:07:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D6120AC79 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 18:07:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id EF22FAC63 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 18:07:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id f4so25284684ybk.11 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 09:07:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=j5ifxLFOO2SynPkjeL3xstMJUH7r152QMO3t1g4tFp4=; b=kGCYCNcZfik33vo9z4oltY0ILGTe/7fmbKK0pcGiHRrzpv1+84xpCQ0w46saCn5cNx IO5GY0vM48mT59wfZoU9nJI+WaF8T6Bpv3xc+v0Hv5LbhPobWW8JluNh/jifLlChagHw tti4BuhRbUZl6qamq3MdFUeUf8Z+WxQGerSssFv04EGsT1gKotm2TlSRSDz7vOVazb9l V+v112mejHcd0acIJ9PRUVf6LMjYnJ+sGkEJ5MJ/WlRqgtQfQ8iPpyhjImalsJV+I+OS 6JAO+3f9yMe6RT27Iew3RHZb5A0GBz1TDsowNxJJENf14THwxLo9RbNliSmRD4ZTto2S OqCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=j5ifxLFOO2SynPkjeL3xstMJUH7r152QMO3t1g4tFp4=; b=ug3q4q9oo92vtUh3yDEotYHRp1d2N5VnrFfLdKIxJzDQUvvMEsh+N3Vp8ubmirrH7b /ZjP3Doe1QDhmklWhxRQTTzEEQlxwYXPkmrF/t7g9UK/BponA3TKI7Vyi/DHY6WAQ/am NKIoBOFaoGrFXfk++16SPvdzkqbMyLXfPqva3MePrt/fuzRwrkJLLq0HPwVUy+MOmF6P qCTEye7MKNJqPRNx3WNdtXLm//UiVCYXHurHHiiWqlxSwMYzPumoVsZ/hFc/EFhgVsh0 LnIWwqRoNa66GtyiB+/EaY8ArjwA6NE1pb6H4eRc0X7OXrRRS73KeNMK6DiBhGVDueby UVzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qvcC5F2oBWTmG4D5CFGKEHz7FbbBC+VwwTrWGXSoJWTqG8OlB FeulgksGs6XQGFxcF0YpW1j6n9dh7VakotQ3kBGnnpIy3azEFg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdHzeMgZbo/P0bF5iWfAIZFIDOPm1hTLcu73mfMYnObnN7kT01ygv05JzdxeQk5mnCq1IJJU84ymETCSwoQZE= X-Received: by 2002:a25:d296:: with SMTP id j144mr326021ybg.33.1614791250329; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 09:07:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <048e4a73b9243606c94656180c00d0f9735a5346.camel@odiso.com> In-Reply-To: <048e4a73b9243606c94656180c00d0f9735a5346.camel@odiso.com> From: Dimitri Alexandris Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:06:54 +0200 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] allow-ovs vs auto X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 17:07:38 -0000 All of my proxmox (5) have allow-ovs in every vmbr. On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 11:16 AM wrote: > if you use ifupdown2, it'll use "auto ..." > > this is because ifupdown2 is able to manage relationship. > > The web interface will setup correct configuration for you if you use > ifupdown2 or ifupdown1. > > > > > Le mardi 02 mars 2021 =C3=A0 12:23 +0800, Hongyi Zhao a =C3=A9crit : > > If I create an OVS Bridge with the Autostart option using pve's web > > interface, the following configuration will be generated: > > > > auto vmbr0 > > iface vmbr0 inet manual > > ovs_type OVSBridge > > > > OTOH, the examples given on the wiki website > > use the following format: > > > > allow-ovs vmbr0 > > iface vmbr0 inet manual > > ovs_type OVSBridge > > > > So, I want to know if the "allow-ovs" and "auto" keywords are > > equivalent in the context for my above scenario. Any hints will be > > appreciated. > > > > Regards > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >