From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0B4178059 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:42:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BDD4A183DF for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:41:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 79E48183C8 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:41:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id n10so2612749qke.12 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 09:41:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=z1KKj0NkTqajXefkKXjHv+pHzrg6tEAVEEB4pUlcaDQ=; b=nvFYlwFH2owkzqbVsg69X2QFxDW/5ogTg7Ru71PNyATW3QgUS64/rJOzSf+CrFTeas nvdUCdlDZ6BrR2uY3B5IKtRWX8GGSJCwcFs2hfP9isdkFWwBA9+j40mQOH/q1dL/3OuK xQFMmrJCPqZFOAKkUqeZ6/kqGCq53ZiXwCMwXupgM/6fJIRCD3RRCIvc1bEviZ0PMIEk hBCbAc5psGeWroYC09sXj4vfY8Vj7teGzwOzV1UHpAQMOxfZg98JIE+GywlyqpDgpz9t lpRnxkb0oD8x3NtlJ6vv5m9dBLrc7eXASbAwcCf7bpt2yGc4WNAe6lYfCkvNHaJMz/42 jBiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=z1KKj0NkTqajXefkKXjHv+pHzrg6tEAVEEB4pUlcaDQ=; b=FJMpmDJPtEISTAymoLFOUh8+Wn3fetaoeFGTZ7RhzIlmJ4QQ7oNYjL0gEJEQ0/tEfJ RkyBixYhDb05T20n3fZf3lbFhLf6KVcRISTXkO3JzCgSVCTFcrip+ccFBVE1cKRysZDM HpqARX8gTOOwxvBr88f9Qte+qY69jf3Xo/2DhpaCoReyHXi/seJTVqcx+b/9XTypO0qk EKQAG25luC0DhmP1vba7w7f6Cy73aKNcQyCvtXF7OxhdTQaJ0IGH7rZEZ33IkQ8cwJ7Y Vw0Rf8kRSqtazUhjaPqK08tVetSqm2VvXGPehKyZVYaheGi7FeTQbV07YLf9BkIHFmLi 358g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ljBn7AQ8okksvZ0EJ2pkoMTlEbrEW1i+++CgQGwtdBCJbYKL9 ZbedFHekPPfShRYgmpdvrsa8sII/PFnt1QvVp8E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxHnb0MrEkephFQeu1E4OMlWUvScoh1JAKuoP7Ky4XXDd8KLIPJ4urSC9qTc+Z6BPXbjwT20chCeRTAmySXt3U= X-Received: by 2002:a37:54f:: with SMTP id 76mr34985446qkf.479.1626885705185; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Gilberto Ferreira Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:41:08 -0300 Message-ID: To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com Cc: Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.068 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT 0.25 Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider FREEMAIL_REPLY 1 From and body contain different freemails HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_SHORT 0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR 1.242 Uses a numeric IP address in URL RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PVE 7 & LACP X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:42:24 -0000 So did you solve the issue? --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em qua., 21 de jul. de 2021 =C3=A0s 12:49, Uwe Sauter escreveu: > Hi Gilberto, > > thanks for that tip. Unfortunately the network configuration quits a few > steps before the bridge is > configured. The needed bond0 is not created=E2=80=A6 > > > Regards, > > Uwe > > > Am 21.07.21 um 17:45 schrieb Gilberto Ferreira: > > Perhaps you need to change or add this feature in the network interface > file: > > > > > https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Add= ress_Change > > < > https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Add= ress_Change > > > > > > > > > > --- > > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > > (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Em qua., 21 de jul. de 2021 =C3=A0s 12:18, Uwe Sauter < > uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com > > > escreveu: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Fresh installation of PVE 7 with all available updates. > > > > It looks like I'm unable to configure bonding of two interfaces > using LCAP. > > > > Output from "ip a": > > 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN > group default qlen 1000 > > link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 > > inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > inet6 ::1/128 scope host > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 2: eno1: mtu 1500 qdisc mq master > vmbr1224 state UP group default > > qlen 1000 > > link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > altname enp24s0f0 > > 3: enp59s0f4: mtu 9000 qdisc mq > state UP group default qlen 1000 > > link/ether 00:07:43:18:82:70 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > inet6 fe80::207:43ff:fe18:8270/64 scope link > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 4: enp59s0f4d1: mtu 9000 qdisc mq > state UP group default qlen 1000 > > link/ether 00:07:43:18:82:78 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > inet6 fe80::207:43ff:fe18:8278/64 scope link > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 5: eno2: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group > default qlen 1000 > > link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > altname enp24s0f1 > > 6: ibp94s0: mtu 2044 qdisc noop state DOWN > group default qlen 256 > > link/infiniband > 80:00:0a:08:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:2c:14:51 brd > > 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff > > 7: ibp94s0d1: mtu 2044 qdisc noop state DOWN > group default qlen 256 > > link/infiniband > 80:00:0a:09:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:2c:14:52 brd > > 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff > > 8: vmbr1224: mtu 1500 qdisc > noqueue state UP group default > > qlen 1000 > > link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > inet 10.224.203.1/16 scope global > vmbr1224 > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > inet6 fe80::a6bf:1ff:fe2f:63f2/64 scope link > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > > > > > My current /etc/network/interfaces, which is missing the bridges fo= r > the VMs: > > auto lo > > iface lo inet loopback > > > > auto eno1 > > iface eno1 inet manual > > > > auto enp59s0f4 > > iface enp59s0f4 inet manual > > mtu 9000 > > > > auto enp59s0f4d1 > > iface enp59s0f4d1 inet manual > > mtu 9000 > > > > auto bond0 > > iface bond0 inet manual > > slaves enp59s0f4 enp59s0f4d1 > > bond-downdelay 200 > > bond-miimon 100 > > bond-mode 802.3ad > > bond-updelay 200 > > > > auto vmbr1224 > > iface vmbr1224 inet static > > address 10.224.203.1 > > netmask 255.255.0.0 > > gateway 10.224.200.1 > > bridge_ports eno1 > > bridge_stp off > > bridge_fd 0 > > > > ## # VLAN 155 nativ on bond0 > > ## auto vmbr155 > > ## iface vmbr155 inet manual > > ## mtu 9000 > > ## bridge_ports bond0 > > ## bridge_stp off > > ## bridge_fd 0 > > > > > > This config was copied over from the PVE 6 installation on the same > host which experienced a SSD > > failure and thus was re-installed with PVE 7. > > > > > > Am I missing something? Am I being blind? > > > > > > Any help is appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Uwe > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pve-user mailing list > > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > > > > >