From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28D5F1FF16C for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 13:26:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 733911479B; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 13:26:47 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1723807598; x=1724412398; darn=lists.proxmox.com; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BZLSrmjTXs03W1bGLURJMQEPu7GDWxrnRJ0v3sKgDSM=; b=AWq7LKC4ZDq0CWZ+glrvuE4TIuIKmuUEMF9LfRWVobVBkpbieQs7b5s/+tzdpW2Q93 +lwqm2AzgPzAUlEDVBGSE0j0jujU5xfQ1CaZagEvAqBJVDtAHm/c5KCjWyou8e56ivk5 8ghpcDK9LnpD98NJJGmrvyUx3DfkpQFKARnKL3/3H7Z1KpyPDwpw/F/OGJJs4AeXncng xlnk/IH5rCWC4wYbHSxRznt7RUL7FdA/fsuTDOMIhHARAtqi4w3dOvj/OfJKj1lLPnMd WqMQl4qVKu/esmYSWCTrYUwxwLAHasAnvI/0IiOCagNFN1HZQcqVYhyzaW8V6t6/RSk+ 3eJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723807598; x=1724412398; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=BZLSrmjTXs03W1bGLURJMQEPu7GDWxrnRJ0v3sKgDSM=; b=agKjdCZkbdTOCu9JlO134t321GEXk/uqB9vPQgTiKTsLQ0pnhYpFoR2uTGmrzpLKyb pyS0otBJNmus4Ls1zYchPXQgFXDeLo8breHBA1CV1XU9REmmnn11D0mUEbxADbzJjoDY ucdE0QFLfpORPuqvetSu2Im7m6Yb1JXM/efYOFZGMKlzdMeLamheQbwltVMf+LapbZxH o7pCpjfoc7Rt6naVSBoP5G991IGYBZPdg6DCx7QUi5XUKRBh1PjSozfLxr6gjmvoeGnK Rm+r7v458v2S6wWGwH4UqthwjQp2manNvL3sA3IOX+rBqzFiEboReBpwlxsUNte502xG 3e5w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVMo6wVWnzJDnZ8uV/a4hZdiTn4Zp3GA9Bwv0hC3TOUlrTdgHoOzkVMUW5y42AmpipweYKvErtF2xjnKzx2MkcT31Y4Buq1SnZTYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZCvRRChrk5yFc74vusFAVJcZOvJfhUQmQxHwGKSmaZgouIPPD o6FVnmTKN6fKatH4ohgTPCzwy7nElkMvF1pMKVlfRCFk/WUkzpbnZg4rdhXr3VaDxLZ7hYGxk9v L7biKaCrPbtv92BZBgw44g1k38Xk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHqdd4wlBn2GBb1e1TQ3MOfgZWKL24ikQ0Ds8jjVkox6oGntX0MwC/AsqFD3ecqnpPZDY51uQea3EOxdF3uTYI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:12c7:b0:52c:deba:7e6e with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5331c6b2726mr1872415e87.29.1723807596919; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 04:26:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <c6aa5e29-4a11-43e3-b9d8-76890bfd52b2@gmail.com> <822bb310-e82f-4690-bf83-a73cbe957959@proxmox.com> <534f2488-4441-43eb-9767-5e20b531f6b3@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <534f2488-4441-43eb-9767-5e20b531f6b3@gmail.com> From: Gilberto Ferreira <gilberto.nunes32@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:26:24 -0300 Message-ID: <CAOKSTBu75pYDCQs7KDN7xP2-9-J512pX74bnVrqLC-1R-Q8G0Q@mail.gmail.com> To: matthew@peregrineit.net, Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.581 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT 0.25 Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR 1.242 Uses a numeric IP address in URL POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Problem With Bond & VLANs - Help Please X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> There's a lot of DOWN and NO CARRIER I think this indicates a physical connection problem or some sort of --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira +55 (47) 99676-7530 Proxmox VE VinChin Backup & Restore Em sex., 16 de ago. de 2024, 07:51, duluxoz <duluxoz@gmail.com> escreveu: > Hi Stephan, > > My apologises, I should have been more precise. > > What doesn't work? Most of the ifaces are down (won't come up > automatically as I expect (not even NIC3)), and so I have no > connectivity to the LAN, let alone the rest of the outside world. > > Yes, each VLAN should have its own gateway - each VLAN is its own > subnet, of course. > > Results of `ip r`: > > ~~~ > default via 10.0.200.1 dev vmbr0 proto kernal onlink linkdown > 10.0.100.0/24 dev bond0.100 proto kernal scope link src 10.0.100.0 > linkdown > 10.0.200.0/24 dev bond0.200 proto kernal scope link src 10.0.200.0 > linkdown > 10.0.200.0/24 dev vmbr0 proto kernal scope link src 10.0.200.100 linkdown > ~~~ > > Results of `ip a`: > > ~~~ > 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN > group default qlen 1000 > link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 > inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 2: eno0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group > default qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:1b:21:e4:a6:f4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group > default qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:1b:21:e4:a6:f5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 4: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group > default qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:1b:21:e4:a6:f6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 5: bond0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc > noqueue master vmbr0 state DOWN group default qlen 1000 > link/ether 4a:3a:67:59:ac:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 6: bond0.100@bond0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc > noqueue state LOWERLAYERDOWN group default qlen 1000 > link/ether 4a:3a:67:59:ac:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 10.0.100.0/24 scope global bond0.100 > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 7: bond0.200@bond0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc > noqueue state LOWERLAYERDOWN group default qlen 1000 > link/ether 4a:3a:67:59:ac:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 10.0.200.0/24 scope global bond0.200 > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 8: vmbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue > state DOWN group default qlen 1000 > link/ether 4a:3a:67:59:ac:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 10.0.200.100/24 scope global vmbr0 > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > ~~~ > > Thanks for taking a look > > Cheers > > dulux-oz > > > On 16/8/24 19:53, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > > > > On 8/16/24 09:36, duluxoz wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Disclaimer: I'm coming from an EL background - this is my first venture > >> into Debian-world :-) > >> > >> So I'm having an issue getting the NICs, Bond, and VLANs correctly > >> configured on a new Proxmox Node (Old oVirt Node). This worked on the > >> old oVirt config (abit a different set of config files/statements). > >> > >> What I'm trying to achieve: > >> > >> * Proxmox Node IP Address: 10.0.200.100/24, Tag:VLAN 200 > >> * Gateway: 10.0.200.1 > >> * Bond: NIC1 (eno0) & NIC2 (eno1), 802.3ad > >> * VLAN bond0.100: 10.0.100.0/24, Gateway 10.0.100.1 > >> * VLAN bond0.200: 10.0.200.0/24, Gateway 10.0.200.1 > >> * NIC3 (eno2): 10.0.300.100/24 - not really relevant, as its not part > >> of the Bond, but I've included it to be thorough > > What *exactly* doesn't work? > > Does the configuration not apply? Do you not get any connectivity with > > internet / specific networks? > > > > > > First thing that springs to mind is that you cannot configure two > > default gateways. There can only be one default gateway. You can > > configure different gateways for different subnets / interfaces. Or you > > can configure different routing tables for different processes. > > > > Your current configuration specifies three gateways. I assume you want > > to use different gateways for different subnets? > > > > > > How does the output of the following commands look like? > > > > ip a > > ip r > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user