From: Gilberto Ferreira <gilberto.nunes32@gmail.com>
To: matthew@peregrineit.net,
Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Problem With Bond & VLANs - Help Please
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:26:24 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOKSTBu75pYDCQs7KDN7xP2-9-J512pX74bnVrqLC-1R-Q8G0Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534f2488-4441-43eb-9767-5e20b531f6b3@gmail.com>
There's a lot of DOWN and NO CARRIER
I think this indicates a physical connection problem or some sort of
---
Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
+55 (47) 99676-7530
Proxmox VE
VinChin Backup & Restore
Em sex., 16 de ago. de 2024, 07:51, duluxoz <duluxoz@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Hi Stephan,
>
> My apologises, I should have been more precise.
>
> What doesn't work? Most of the ifaces are down (won't come up
> automatically as I expect (not even NIC3)), and so I have no
> connectivity to the LAN, let alone the rest of the outside world.
>
> Yes, each VLAN should have its own gateway - each VLAN is its own
> subnet, of course.
>
> Results of `ip r`:
>
> ~~~
> default via 10.0.200.1 dev vmbr0 proto kernal onlink linkdown
> 10.0.100.0/24 dev bond0.100 proto kernal scope link src 10.0.100.0
> linkdown
> 10.0.200.0/24 dev bond0.200 proto kernal scope link src 10.0.200.0
> linkdown
> 10.0.200.0/24 dev vmbr0 proto kernal scope link src 10.0.200.100 linkdown
> ~~~
>
> Results of `ip a`:
>
> ~~~
> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
> group default qlen 1000
> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 2: eno0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group
> default qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:1b:21:e4:a6:f4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group
> default qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:1b:21:e4:a6:f5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 4: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group
> default qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:1b:21:e4:a6:f6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 5: bond0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
> noqueue master vmbr0 state DOWN group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 4a:3a:67:59:ac:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 6: bond0.100@bond0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
> noqueue state LOWERLAYERDOWN group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 4a:3a:67:59:ac:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 10.0.100.0/24 scope global bond0.100
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 7: bond0.200@bond0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
> noqueue state LOWERLAYERDOWN group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 4a:3a:67:59:ac:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 10.0.200.0/24 scope global bond0.200
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 8: vmbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
> state DOWN group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 4a:3a:67:59:ac:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 10.0.200.100/24 scope global vmbr0
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> ~~~
>
> Thanks for taking a look
>
> Cheers
>
> dulux-oz
>
>
> On 16/8/24 19:53, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> >
> > On 8/16/24 09:36, duluxoz wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Disclaimer: I'm coming from an EL background - this is my first venture
> >> into Debian-world :-)
> >>
> >> So I'm having an issue getting the NICs, Bond, and VLANs correctly
> >> configured on a new Proxmox Node (Old oVirt Node). This worked on the
> >> old oVirt config (abit a different set of config files/statements).
> >>
> >> What I'm trying to achieve:
> >>
> >> * Proxmox Node IP Address: 10.0.200.100/24, Tag:VLAN 200
> >> * Gateway: 10.0.200.1
> >> * Bond: NIC1 (eno0) & NIC2 (eno1), 802.3ad
> >> * VLAN bond0.100: 10.0.100.0/24, Gateway 10.0.100.1
> >> * VLAN bond0.200: 10.0.200.0/24, Gateway 10.0.200.1
> >> * NIC3 (eno2): 10.0.300.100/24 - not really relevant, as its not part
> >> of the Bond, but I've included it to be thorough
> > What *exactly* doesn't work?
> > Does the configuration not apply? Do you not get any connectivity with
> > internet / specific networks?
> >
> >
> > First thing that springs to mind is that you cannot configure two
> > default gateways. There can only be one default gateway. You can
> > configure different gateways for different subnets / interfaces. Or you
> > can configure different routing tables for different processes.
> >
> > Your current configuration specifies three gateways. I assume you want
> > to use different gateways for different subnets?
> >
> >
> > How does the output of the following commands look like?
> >
> > ip a
> > ip r
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-16 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-16 7:36 duluxoz
2024-08-16 8:05 ` Christian Kivalo
2024-08-16 9:43 ` duluxoz
2024-08-16 9:53 ` Stefan Hanreich
2024-08-16 10:42 ` duluxoz
2024-08-16 11:26 ` Gilberto Ferreira [this message]
2024-08-16 11:26 ` proxmox
2024-08-16 11:32 ` proxmox
2024-08-18 11:14 duluxoz
2024-08-18 14:07 ` Gilberto Ferreira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOKSTBu75pYDCQs7KDN7xP2-9-J512pX74bnVrqLC-1R-Q8G0Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gilberto.nunes32@gmail.com \
--cc=matthew@peregrineit.net \
--cc=pve-user@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox