From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40FA8773BD for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:45:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 33F832FFAC for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:45:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com (mail-qt1-x832.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1E2B22FF98 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:45:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id z25so15098986qto.12 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 04:45:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RbCQ/POwj/GX0zlM0dNtGNuqpRpFUuLdBMDZmFd3zLA=; b=fJyAkDRI3qTy+gbUkfzZHupXLNwQN0fCIBmJeZlSDMQZsRvFTxf4RR12XLr5rLrpT/ 6GgXrbNX/ZlYoVqufPZoMfAgdR2Ib4cIYQr/Glb3LTdBmUoZD8EGf/QLNxREOk58Dgs0 uYhazNbY07TtQ7MUt5PaOCRpuefNlq5Nd/jPhoDavw4xZpC96LjLKf2WPl48B1yZFTVH 335ONbefNstJfJ7yJpvdtGL83oGWc+IU9Cv2p0OIb+XQY7bFoOSXuQWcyLkHaR89WBCI z452DhX+EQNQwZ72AiSJ0P6J8CjNnb+F8PEDdYL0SBt8W6/BBJNhtJpp5SZz+ODjZcqp Q3CA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=RbCQ/POwj/GX0zlM0dNtGNuqpRpFUuLdBMDZmFd3zLA=; b=Z4WGZHxO3/qvU/yxwdojeJDW5T0uq05OrOeRfFjZ41IfvupeoiT830nPyHA65YoWes tcK1+n1PwCortlSUX35tYlW6orP3XpGUDn08t9BLoxkkOB0/SbLnsEzgGO0F5l/rFOqy Oos8D9N45mBTbAsilHxMhcqBraca0O2l/eZOnWT0lmBRPVnV4cZddYt/rvF180YRoK9V YkPcxE7zxoZsPXCp0yq/+jk/0PfnCUy0h5xbPRIljsR9eArHYHKWEQRon7cTsZQdK2Pl uWTnXQL1l0P04MSfy8vPzpLoz3GboME3lioShwWjcApjMugPPUTJFHsV2PdzwheWAGAG ekjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531LJ4r3kUY6nO4gL1kRiWaaDU//+Brtdd48nKKfc0fQtwZ642CQ Dt6zxrDUE6ID1xKspNzZECedyZG/SSAn6S9svqRPGy7ziOE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz59ZspDCgcUPfTGH9kWslorl9ST6nold6V3L9ZyejqJpjlflUt3F4BmhNDTVh+fFs9ohZdY+s9rcmLlwnEenM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:d4:: with SMTP id p20mr9192355qtw.234.1626781542677; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 04:45:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8242aca652161e867154eba4f9b5a65fa2ee9298.camel@odiso.com> <10e5b75a-0e2b-ed80-f188-38a9be4a5a14@tuxis.nl> In-Reply-To: From: Gilberto Ferreira Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 08:45:05 -0300 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.237 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT 0.25 Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [gluster.org, readthedocs.io, proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox questions/features X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:45:51 -0000 Hi everybody. I had read this in the Gluster qemu integration ( https://staged-gluster-docs.readthedocs.io/en/release3.7.0beta1/Features/qe= mu-integration/ ) - Tuning the volume for virt-store There are recommended settings available for virt-store. This provide good performance characteristics when enabled on the volume that was use= d for virt-store Refer to http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Virt-store-usec= ase#Tunables for recommended tunables and for applying them on the volume, http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Virt-store-usec= ase#Applying_the_Tunables_on_the_volume This could apply to Proxmox as well??? Thanks --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em ter., 20 de jul. de 2021 =C3=A0s 07:57, Alex K escreveu: > Anyone has any feedback to share regarding the support of multiple > glusterfs server nodes? > Thanx > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 3:44 PM Alex K wrote: > > > Resending as it seems screenshots are not accepted. > > > > Regarding the *backup-volfile-servers* option when attaching gluster > > volumes, I tried to configure it from UI (DC -> Storage -> Add) as belo= w > > though it seems it is not supported. > > I am getting the error: > > > > Parameter verification failed. (400) > > *server2*: invalid format - value does not look like a valid server nam= e > > or IP address > > > > How can one define more than one backup server as below? > > > > backup-volfile-servers=3Dnode1,node2 > > > > This is useful when having a 3 replica or more gluster server setup. > > > > Thanx, > > Alex > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 2:01 AM alexandre derumier > > wrote: > > > >> Le vendredi 09 juillet 2021 =C3=A0 10:16 +0200, Mark Schouten a =C3=A9= crit : > >> > Maybe easier to use the metric-server-service for that? > >> > >> it's more than we don't have some values currently, like vm real host > >> cpu usage. (including vhost-net process for example), > >> > >> or real host memory usage (for windows, when ballonning is enabled, we > >> don't see the zero filled memory by windows, so reserved on the host). > >> > >> My patches to get values from cgroups are already applied, > >> but they are not yet exposed in pvestatd. > >> > >> > >> I would like also to improve pve-ha-manager vm migration based on the > >> hosts load too. > >> > >> > >> I just need time to rework on this ^_^ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> pve-user mailing list > >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >