From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A86977FE5 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:46:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 019C017D46 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:46:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id EB84A17D3B for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:46:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com with SMTP id x6so1146586qvx.4 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:46:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3wBBE2wPYFDZqFzlJijQS0vCb64n6bd0y0jslFmYMls=; b=HXfeLQbOWMa52/zk9bppT1cVqTRZC5VPPwkrKl4/H2Kb3gD+6ik6Ee6T4HKJUp0csc gSXqPeFTuhhqmuQi/O5dSN6+WGnBuDvp9mvkVtnXYnW1ExlAaR+mZxC5vQgAp+2W01lP wvf1+VjBUF0UC7y9m4xwfbBRBkhm1vDJzAjs6/j6T8Aaa0xU0inpPli0Ck1otgzR9NtR eckWwD1eIOQMT/R3btkBxzaY6xZ5iE7R8tW4AGALKBdD/zp1rV2pOd5okrguUKUa6Um2 O1l3DdlIlopj0+dcea5MSAEZ7lrepy3xyEp/lHEYwXi3P6+HAtHP/bQmvrJsi8++Sn3w T7TA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=3wBBE2wPYFDZqFzlJijQS0vCb64n6bd0y0jslFmYMls=; b=S4fBjP9VEF++v42OFzcn5nRmLOceT1PeS5V9Us0EH/6tbPHJu5mUL2r1J0KRSpq4id uG39ILRsbk8W+oVzxhE7a6R+1ssuOSnINEllMdQcHsjW9NNuA65xVUXfb6iO0061JvIr T3DdEzO17GoFnlOSVzL6wCgPRGJ3FIEG4RCIw7wB3AhMU/KBpukUMo26g2T5x8+bXH6Q lAhfnoWMj/rWKFz2tzpJ7kuuL1iUxjlUswP8/OWFBMGfMuytTX80CrrYsL4zL1zHiJJi 19/4cHU4vhchWkQ8d3IqC0hPUaNyfaiYcQXooHsuJr6375JN2SEM5wBgD+cW7REEWvs3 CaDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wIHWRnZKBhDixN8Wyn3Meo6H917RBeY8qAbAoyqlV0U1JfvlB e2IBqKAgKIWCfcPOHrQ/a94AGC3FyF3lbE1lFQE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwdIx+awXJ42oLEtbdDG71ns3FMhnd8jwaGiwB6JQ2Y+pj697F/vdkNmrCp5embNktog22Sc4XCAqm5dF4VhpM= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9ac7:: with SMTP id k7mr37025233qvf.49.1626882368616; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:46:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Gilberto Ferreira Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:45:32 -0300 Message-ID: To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com, Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.542 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT 0.25 Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider GB_TO_NAME_FREEMAIL 0.01 Freemail spear phish with free mail HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_SHORT 0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR 1.242 Uses a numeric IP address in URL POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PVE 7 & LACP X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 15:46:48 -0000 Perhaps you need to change or add this feature in the network interface file: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Addre= ss_Change --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em qua., 21 de jul. de 2021 =C3=A0s 12:18, Uwe Sauter escreveu: > Hi all, > > Fresh installation of PVE 7 with all available updates. > > It looks like I'm unable to configure bonding of two interfaces using LCA= P. > > Output from "ip a": > 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group > default qlen 1000 > link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 > inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > inet6 ::1/128 scope host > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 2: eno1: mtu 1500 qdisc mq master > vmbr1224 state UP group default > qlen 1000 > link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > altname enp24s0f0 > 3: enp59s0f4: mtu 9000 qdisc mq state U= P > group default qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:07:43:18:82:70 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::207:43ff:fe18:8270/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 4: enp59s0f4d1: mtu 9000 qdisc mq state > UP group default qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:07:43:18:82:78 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::207:43ff:fe18:8278/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 5: eno2: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group > default qlen 1000 > link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > altname enp24s0f1 > 6: ibp94s0: mtu 2044 qdisc noop state DOWN group > default qlen 256 > link/infiniband > 80:00:0a:08:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:2c:14:51 brd > 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff > 7: ibp94s0d1: mtu 2044 qdisc noop state DOWN group > default qlen 256 > link/infiniband > 80:00:0a:09:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:2c:14:52 brd > 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff > 8: vmbr1224: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue > state UP group default qlen 1000 > link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 10.224.203.1/16 scope global vmbr1224 > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > inet6 fe80::a6bf:1ff:fe2f:63f2/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > > My current /etc/network/interfaces, which is missing the bridges for the > VMs: > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > > auto eno1 > iface eno1 inet manual > > auto enp59s0f4 > iface enp59s0f4 inet manual > mtu 9000 > > auto enp59s0f4d1 > iface enp59s0f4d1 inet manual > mtu 9000 > > auto bond0 > iface bond0 inet manual > slaves enp59s0f4 enp59s0f4d1 > bond-downdelay 200 > bond-miimon 100 > bond-mode 802.3ad > bond-updelay 200 > > auto vmbr1224 > iface vmbr1224 inet static > address 10.224.203.1 > netmask 255.255.0.0 > gateway 10.224.200.1 > bridge_ports eno1 > bridge_stp off > bridge_fd 0 > > ## # VLAN 155 nativ on bond0 > ## auto vmbr155 > ## iface vmbr155 inet manual > ## mtu 9000 > ## bridge_ports bond0 > ## bridge_stp off > ## bridge_fd 0 > > > This config was copied over from the PVE 6 installation on the same host > which experienced a SSD > failure and thus was re-installed with PVE 7. > > > Am I missing something? Am I being blind? > > > Any help is appreciated. > > > Thanks, > > Uwe > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > >