From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AC5370DBA for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:35:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F16521AF80 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:34:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 651041AF72 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:34:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id d9so14489993ioo.2 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:34:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WiggxkFhK79H9EBDBCzQGuTlvYXjBz5lHnJ1aE8TUDw=; b=f3J8y/r7kpMHL5wqItqkiPZFDN/aPIofGp8UE1wCX5k52wcOd2X1ib0uILNHZ0zaWZ 0DTKrOPWhAkoqzseVEDRuZIXznfgcR5QzqccTWqZ1pd9HZIe24yoilBwTrzjm1G44Hon tyS1r7nN4CQ02bc2oR634WbDI1dNakXpBy0uNAjClPUpP5zvUOxGaphkGFzZYX4KnX5o 2T1lSqva6OVVX7xH/nBd3cGHkGnxoBERD8bp1ix10msh6jwsEngiTrVV8oRHXJqYqbRT P9lYNtvWbkD+VtsFVYObwocjUkSJtD42SHsPmm5l7TnF+0K/MOSzJuGs/O+bSaCB/xjA gbpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WiggxkFhK79H9EBDBCzQGuTlvYXjBz5lHnJ1aE8TUDw=; b=GKXDasit9gJAkEMpjT9CJSwTV01wpd6SeIoXcs8zFSH3a4h0f5hljWkOmlinrxvsX3 eEUO563gYeM41IreZV8os9HBLfrYaeSswIPPAMDlrFUlD900QlLaqp+Bf7m79UeBxRV+ nqj3/rJG56HZTna1i6XSFimjyHw24JoGMMvu4YRgJm8ZDIbcVpJcNZ0IORdaj7hVteWi fSsBEV1/lPRGiavYx1ZXnKQ0NoL2K9UcSv/wpVCNfIcQc1atr9LCU6KRVOHLaWZgI8sg m+ec/YEl5PZQQr9L3cYB8I9CZ4vDrQRgrX94/J4w60OfTuFYcO2+g2rDvrFOY+55o+BC t2ZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Lvzd4L3skJNOLI7n3m8uTyhwGr3pXTbQSTAQxtfqjRloJgMBG +mxcUilhFRReDkfdzbBxir8aIdIh4/5lWGX/p/b7Z1TK X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwiyDc0eXUr2x/a9VYG6yPGM+pVlvQ2oJYrNGZwxxJOwX6DtCQARBARchxGgP4zCywNKCjQzyS8Izec/hLVvqU= X-Received: by 2002:a02:3505:: with SMTP id k5mr11599437jaa.123.1624664089310; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:34:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kyle Schmitt Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 18:34:38 -0500 Message-ID: To: pve-user@pve.proxmox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.950 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [PVE-User] Is it safe to remove orphaned disk images? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 23:35:00 -0000 I have a root disk image for a container on an old network share, and I forgot to tell the system to remove the old image after migrating it to the newer network share. Because the VMID still exists, the web-ui is refusing to remove the disk image. If I manually remove it from the share, via linux, will it break anything? Thanks --Kyle