From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D05747A59E for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:33:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B8A272C7B5 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:32:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 9E3382C79E for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:32:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id t11so13263546lfl.11 for ; Fri, 07 May 2021 08:32:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tecnetmza-com-ar.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hGR3K6uQ7SYN2+LI+DDOcezY0cvhNzrN1eI6Kr8Uw48=; b=zsSsv357jSvssKFPlwFzZNawXUueEmRtQ1EoLTRh3cIWTGNMqTkk0Z+e0EQY1OqUfz GUeYHDFRXPXNeLG4wCE0fFxNCQAuFS9E9TPtAMLhrkwoBpibyAB846W8h4dp6mJaJ4Vv sEOwS3G8j4ncXBd+iiWMewjnLU90Jrlc92yl9T2PmHBhAvMi5fs0/9qxQ7u3kHbvFkrY ZcxWH68RI3hLpUGxQYWfy7eCiDBPzpkyjI4GPUbT1rWZjnrp2eqF9gY10r5C09Xn7RyM 855FIAiXfM3G8UE2KirFlxq6VPTAwLd01I/Aj8uxflpIAU8+DjGLEYJXqqAGpGASFrRe dcNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=hGR3K6uQ7SYN2+LI+DDOcezY0cvhNzrN1eI6Kr8Uw48=; b=DRKjTKdKrVwU2MIDtaUACHSKDneVxJl3YzkE3CnuNLpdFNNf+tW2bM0vkX6qPW5YF0 pX4kFFyNNuEgtJZayIDfs5yRc3m1yvKoj1CM0jv4H5ywB+3LeJj6Lt7z9FgvI7bf4jgg I+D5Vw8rW7ihwdOC4MLlmiBL/GRlpFG5/eLO9Q2c5I+Ey0GPSQj9S6Y5XC4gl+HPUDgY pAN3lgA0QgKkNCg8Lk4SvRk3Fb7SZg8oAC//Ib6TwQ2z3uuRg5899bHK+lwUf2AIWr1K c9wWHdUuiuNB7+rWC28Su8gdu6PPt5frAxyvNMe/nqD4t/fzh/0yC3/Yiy/m/ZjwNxo8 iqZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KGtcvDJyEX0kdBw4bqmwduHQCGzwp6MxOz7TtnGZJ8zODPGkr rq9QC9E6gTqxKr+MZdTtwpxITccARlkh17+/3ewqevW7SW48FUE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtPmdwO//nRWR6KtyYsSc46n2Yc4pf078MM6Ya95A6TgQfp1PRqH7Ir7zOFUqI/2dXhZ1QrCcS4+bab8IJEfo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:21af:: with SMTP id c15mr6802818lft.184.1620401565658; Fri, 07 May 2021 08:32:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1812088100.247408784.1620394362636.JavaMail.zimbra@ipnl.in2p3.fr> In-Reply-To: <1812088100.247408784.1620394362636.JavaMail.zimbra@ipnl.in2p3.fr> From: Leandro Roggerone Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 12:32:42 -0300 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 1 AWL 0.207 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_SOFTFAIL 0.972 SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) T_REMOTE_IMAGE 0.01 Message contains an external image URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] native container strange cpu usage behaviour X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 15:33:24 -0000 thanks Denis , >From same top command , I can notice that server is not blocked , take a look to: %Cpu(s): 0.0 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni,100.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, In my opinion the server is not working at all. Im missing something here ? Strange thing is that cpu is still high after rebooting. Do you think it is a common issue on proxmox containers ? perhaps related to containers architecture , should I consider move my unbound to VM ? Thanks. Libre de virus. www.avast.com <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> El vie, 7 may 2021 a las 11:26, Denis PUGNERE () escribi=C3=B3: > > Buenos dias Leandeo, > > May be look at I/O errors, bad sectors on storage generate I/O wait on CP= U > without any processor activity. > or another source : NFS server not responding. > > Cheers, > Denis > > ----- Le 7 Mai 21, =C3=A0 14:49, Leandro Roggerone leandro@tecnetmza.com.= ar a > =C3=A9crit : > > > Hi guys. > > I was running unbound dns on native proxmox container. > > It is being monitored by librenms. > > After some time running without any problem following happened. > > First begin receiving snmp notifications regarding "high cpu/core > > temperature" > > (temperature was ok when checking at proxmox cli using sensor command) > > Then I noticed that cpu is at %100 all time on lnms cpu graphs. > > SO... > > I take out dns queries , stoped unbound and rebooted container , then > after > > reboot, I have following top output. > > > > top - 12:46:02 up 52 min, 1 user, load average:* 7.93, *5.49, 5.60 > > Tasks: 15 total, 1 running, 14 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > > %Cpu(s): 0.0 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni,100.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, > > 0.0 st > > KiB Mem : 8388608 total, 8141576 free, 39164 used, 207868 > buff/cache > > KiB Swap: 8388604 total, 8388604 free, 0 used. 8349444 avail > Mem > > > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ > COMMAND > > 1 root 20 0 43316 5052 3912 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.13 > systemd > > 39 root 20 0 39092 6660 6372 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.03 > > systemd-journal > > 51 root 20 0 41536 3132 2740 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 > > systemd-udevd > > 57 dbus 20 0 58136 4200 3720 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.01 > > dbus-daemon > > 58 root 20 0 26392 2928 2656 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 > > systemd-logind > > 65 root 20 0 6524 1712 1588 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aget= ty > > 68 root 20 0 6524 1640 1520 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aget= ty > > 69 root 20 0 6524 1612 1488 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aget= ty > > 70 root 20 0 22708 2636 2012 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cron= d > > 273 root 20 0 112932 7688 6656 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.01 sshd > > 275 root 20 0 218560 4996 4180 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.16 > rsyslogd > > 276 root 20 0 124696 15860 10952 S 0.0 0.2 0:01.47 snmp= d > > 291 root 20 0 155340 10596 9240 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.18 sshd > > 293 root 20 0 11944 3072 2596 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.06 bash > > 490 root 20 0 56216 3944 3352 R 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 top > > > > > > So ... Question is , why load average is so high if there is no process= es > > consuming cpu. > > Any idea / feedback about this? > > Thanks. > > > > < > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=3Demail&utm_source=3Dlink&utm_= campaign=3Dsig-email&utm_content=3Dwebmail > > > > Libre > > de virus. www.avast.com > > < > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=3Demail&utm_source=3Dlink&utm_= campaign=3Dsig-email&utm_content=3Dwebmail > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > _______________________________________________ > > pve-user mailing list > > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >