From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <leandro@tecnetmza.com.ar> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61E8D6E74A for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:13:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4FD5F2F0DE for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:13:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C90BC2F0C7 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:13:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id i28so38261030ljm.7 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:13:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tecnetmza-com-ar.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=usyZhVjBYqfRNFyytXU0VDXBHIL0dIP0XBGBuLG8t6U=; b=zy6sK2v7RhLITiLqzdHxMWYuVrTPWKofCh8qS/MEhYnSu0vDw8xPsGDj0q4jO15kbd FGLrj52rkfcdhD/6slnEt2C6pj2yWvN09leYeZFy3yMPaTY3Ag036+Ky33GHHujgDwmi yVtZ4eiwWvfHTGaBdERt1H5u3MuPwCA1y+ok3o4FNk0n8u1uqJe4Wt6B8rMiisV5vUYV 9ffCuXD9j6BFONd1epUvYded1ps7RrkuM+obhgkCNSAzw658fXdUij22Q+ribeJbPaFW agWmx2v3GxMgqyb0Ii7iX9B09e/NNQuury38Zdj6ec6DpyS4HMSUPfl77kb4VvyIVuni VRew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=usyZhVjBYqfRNFyytXU0VDXBHIL0dIP0XBGBuLG8t6U=; b=kqyBucB65Ib4ByOX6YGHqeCHLDxsu7rUsjUYFHHlJ4+BYw29LgtbVQrVWkCOR6tTY0 8AztUJ2KjU9Wlq1lOj61WC+rijncDSf6FZzoxdGPiFsBB9buetDWvKN55sIK66th+eN1 lhky9eWd1DXN2l7vdm2eSrDpk5r2jocPL5apg9WYpyWB5zx2DBmT8U0qP26eRNNRKqQ5 xL85CVSWQmIBJkxnVC4TEmBjrQZMn9dab8xOd6CEmvZ0IcDyftYLg2R+64xLk0KNadnX lpdI5AGrp4fVFNVXRpoDqMpD0+oO2r/2/lgwSoHdoedlWxienRjDK7mKu0uyug99XyQJ +QJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53056bi9PJh2i3QytvYkU83Ls8Ir49lN6F7DkmQWRqw6RXWIrm6x jlBlUMdDWAC/jhBLpRL+se7+jZ3YgXis9ufD1qeB X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyUqjY53ERq8EBlBIADHwjNlkE2l3MaBaOesHvMlFlP2Lv6cgTLBzI/f2SqL9F++B10awZyVo6IqCWIFpeHkok= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:6a03:: with SMTP id f3mr32901577ljc.487.1629817992174; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:13:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <CALt2oz7a9byh5HX-YcPoQBZ=YJguxY3vGqA=iayQzoGdfcZGuQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.458.1629211453.329.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> <CALt2oz5sK5s6Qym6u1=W9SNyN89_uZUCx9aK174q=nSQkJX6UQ@mail.gmail.com> <e5a1f5ef-ab9b-9283-cd90-6aba6acc35ba@holub.co.at> In-Reply-To: <e5a1f5ef-ab9b-9283-cd90-6aba6acc35ba@holub.co.at> From: Leandro Roggerone <leandro@tecnetmza.com.ar> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:13:03 -0300 Message-ID: <CALt2oz5N_Wmp5K4JUxuC3cmVayEEfErVHPuM7sU8BU7TM_HOXQ@mail.gmail.com> To: Martin Holub <martin@holub.co.at> Cc: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.144 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_SOFTFAIL 0.665 SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) T_REMOTE_IMAGE 0.01 Message contains an external image URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] (no subject) X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:13:53 -0000 Hello , Martin. Im still in pve 6.04. I was looking at the document you pointed out (Upgrade from 6.x to 7.0) It is frustrating to see that upgrading is a very difficult process. My cluster contains 2 servers. Both are in production , at 50 - 60 % storage and memory capacity so it is not easy for me to create backups and move VMs. I will study how to proceed with this update from pve 6 to 7. Perhaps: Adding a third new box already running version 7. Adding a networking storage ? need to check out wich one. Meanwhile , until I can go to pve 7 , I think I should upgrate to latest pve 6 and disable automatic upgrades ... Do you think it is ok ? Thanks for your words!! Leandro. El mi=C3=A9, 18 ago 2021 a las 14:58, Martin Holub (<martin@holub.co.at>) escribi=C3=B3: > Hi Leandro, > > Are you already on PVE7? Otherwise, just changing the Sources to Bullseye= , > i'm pretty shure that this will break things, or at least produce unwante= d > results. If you want to upgrade to Debian Bullseye better check > https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0 > > Best regards > Martin > Am 18.08.21 um 15:19 schrieb Leandro Roggerone: > > thanks Martin. > According to documentation , for a non subscription environment ,this is > how it should looks like: > > root@pve:/etc/apt# cat /etc/apt/sources.list > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian bullseye main contrib > > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates main contrib > > # security updates > deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main > contrib > > After running apt-get update from cli , it did not return any error. > seems to be working ok now. > Thanks again. > Leandro. > > El mar, 17 ago 2021 a las 11:44, Martin Holub via pve-user (< > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>) escribi=C3=B3: > >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Martin Holub <martin@holub.co.at> >> To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> Cc: >> Bcc: >> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:43:30 +0200 >> Subject: Re: [PVE-User] (no subject) >> Hi, >> >> On Aug 14th "Bullseye" was released, therefore Buster moved from >> "stable" to "oldstable" and Bullseye became the new "stable" Version of >> Debian. >> >> Cheers. >> Martin >> >> Am 17.08.21 um 16:37 schrieb Leandro Roggerone: >> > root@pve:~# apt-get update >> > Get:1 http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease [65.4 kB] >> > Get:2 http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster InRelease [122 kB] >> > Get:3 http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease [51.9 kB] >> > Reading package lists... Done >> > >> > >> > E: Repository 'http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease' >> changed >> > its 'Suite' value from 'stable' to 'oldstable' >> > N: This must be accepted explicitly before updates for this repository >> can >> > be applied. See apt-secure(8) manpage for details. >> > E: Repository 'http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster InRelease' changed >> its >> > 'Suite' value from 'stable' to 'oldstable' >> > N: This must be accepted explicitly before updates for this repository >> can >> > be applied. See apt-secure(8) manpage for details. >> > E: Repository 'http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease' >> > changed its 'Suite' value from 'stable-updates' to 'oldstable-updates' >> > N: This must be accepted explicitly before updates for this repository >> can >> > be applied. See apt-secure(8) manpage for details. >> > >> > This is my source.list >> > root@pve:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list >> > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster main contrib >> > >> > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster-updates main contrib >> > >> > # security updates >> > deb http://security.debian.org buster/updates main contrib >> > >> > This was working ok until sat 14. >> > Any idea ? >> > Thanks! >> > >> > < >> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=3Demail&utm_source=3Dlink&utm= _campaign=3Dsig-email&utm_content=3Dwebmail >> > >> > Libre >> > de virus. www.avast.com >> > < >> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=3Demail&utm_source=3Dlink&utm= _campaign=3Dsig-email&utm_content=3Dwebmail >> > >> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > pve-user mailing list >> > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >> > >> >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Martin Holub via pve-user <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> >> To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> Cc: Martin Holub <martin@holub.co.at> >> Bcc: >> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:43:30 +0200 >> Subject: Re: [PVE-User] (no subject) >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-user mailing list >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >> > > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=3Demail&utm_source=3Dlink&utm= _campaign=3Dsig-email&utm_content=3Dwebmail> Libre > de virus. www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=3Demail&utm_source=3Dlink&utm= _campaign=3Dsig-email&utm_content=3Dwebmail> > >