From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <jjk.saji@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F079387C6 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:03:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CAECE12BF2 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:03:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:03:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4fe1c285690so1867125e87.3 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 01:03:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1690531396; x=1691136196; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ugv23trUxIQj1nBlDIfwsggWLqVO8njchYKtpHYFAw0=; b=CIcgLZjGs5HqBD/ZsT915xIPQ0aWCA9JfWN1d+RBrddBUlBzMEvOb60zQpxv5RwXeL 2nDJ8cSx2goBAG1NWq+gSGf/AjI1r2vgw3ojcCZD+FkQvi0FDsxBu4mQxK76qPZv6Nhe aktE2tjWcOHOmEsYJGtAXaMn+T+n4XQJJqAzp41vQp8P84wuZEEHnDkVNic4E6ual+R/ Rotc8p/GnTX8ixxV5f4y8JPnmbsZIFepakbTZ5eTYj9mGSyhvk34PCJSdT78Wa2GO/3F oegp4xPGk7L/7/TliFDtryFUud15HnTu4bCX22rKL6pZjj1cu95hp+IP8phZrXe4NzNC 4wbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690531396; x=1691136196; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ugv23trUxIQj1nBlDIfwsggWLqVO8njchYKtpHYFAw0=; b=EzoCymeLI0Mic1z1bqT9U4jz4ydAzBC+Tb4NO8YAtL+JEQ4SYGJy/lTvkMikmEN1tB Zj7zrxpt875/U7nstAPFAiBZGblVu7WII+OO590m8x1tUyFwB3DZRGlBVK1si+drjQGE q4gJ7aTtTOLzQt1+/c2MYxRoDTyZ52jBGyKUGrYG6TJB7oItHpPL44z8SELuefBTuAed z4+CrA/MccEK+7oB/d/clMfS2DO0v3NXJbK3cbIR642vbH0DsOziegzkRiN6bLsTtyfa kb+/3QovRk/tN51bqTOPlG9rbma6v4TTmBcZ1DoWhTJAwQVdZAGT4thfEFSfO8s41nN8 OSCw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLZVxvNu2T7Jl+dIZPv1hwp2fZgcO+8M/C+i27n+gH4vbWVdJZt+ fwO/MrC3cg+jRzG4C9tbOB/w+iqeuL84zj2y3cQ0JJv75BM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlFHJWyCv598SmpRgh8zVJAOMkzkbQ3OokVA2wpb/wAnbKC8ezssbSUHS4XmrcuNdV16CS/UJFo43+WlThPXODk= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:58f7:0:b0:4f6:47a2:7bb4 with SMTP id v23-20020ac258f7000000b004f647a27bb4mr1042264lfo.60.1690531395734; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 01:03:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <CAKeuxjC_urt=CL_x9Pn5rW6U7noNex4bN6bhUTP1ZFpeOOSW4A@mail.gmail.com> <5980bb1b-057e-8136-cf3a-2793ce9f7be7@proxmox.com> <69448B36-7A8A-4577-9EC9-0BA25D3A93A9@me.com> In-Reply-To: <69448B36-7A8A-4577-9EC9-0BA25D3A93A9@me.com> From: Joseph John <jjk.saji@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:03:03 +0400 Message-ID: <CAKeuxjDYboLnGgsh8Ou86JZJw6GVxppY3f0QS2yJoGc55p4jog@mail.gmail.com> To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> Cc: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.co>, Stefan Radman <stefan.radman@me.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.254 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Guidance on how Proxmox 8 treats Intel VROC RAID controller on supermicro x12dpu-6 Server X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 08:03:25 -0000 Dear Aaron, Stefan Good afternoon THANKS a lot Thanks for the advice of "fake RAID", based on the feedback, we are not going to use RAID I will update to the group, our progress Thanks Joseph John On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 6:23=E2=80=AFPM Stefan Radman <stefan.radman@me.com= > wrote: > Hi Joseph > > Further information and advice on mdraid with Proxmox can be found here > > Software RAID - Unsupported Technologies - mdraid > https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Software_RAID#mdraid > For non-production/unsupported setups, where you still want to use mdraid > (please don't!), you can create the required RAID level during Debian > installation and then install Proxmox VE. > > Note the =E2=80=9Cplease don=E2=80=99t=E2=80=9D. > > Regards > > Stefan > > > On Jul 26, 2023, at 15:07, Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com> > wrote: > > > > Please have a look at the same topic being discussed last month > https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/2023-June/017117.html > > > > TL;DR: VROC is usually a "fake raid" and not a real HW RAID. It only > tells the OS what software RAID to create. On Linux that would typically = be > MD-RAID. > > > > Proxmox VE does not ship MD Raid and therefore, those disks will still > be visible as single disks. > > > > Cheers, > > Aaron > > > > On 7/26/23 13:44, Joseph John wrote: > >> Dear All, > >> We are trying to install ProxMox 8 on Supermicro x12dpu-6 , with Intel > VROC > >> RAID Controller , we have configured two SSD in RAID 1 , from the BIO= S > in > >> hardware level and raid volume is created, but when coming to the > proxmox > >> setup , the installation step is not showing the RAID volume, but it > shows > >> the physical disk separately . > >> Like get guidance on how Proxmox treats Intel VROC RAID Controller an= d > the > >> possible next step > >> Thanks > >> Thanks > >> Joseph John > >> _______________________________________________ > >> pve-user mailing list > >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pve-user mailing list > > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > > >