From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B4BBCF43 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 06:57:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D54581CBB8 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 06:57:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 06:57:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-51e28cac164so1113952a12.1 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 21:57:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692248271; x=1692853071; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BE7BuFtBkki69cDwkuiuKGa0jc+dDtFlBm+zVAuQLjs=; b=e5jQJY2B2eIX4fhscj4+BRDEhrZ4egyR2KsvC5/4twrAUC1pbGLmzuVmMH1lRT1gTf /GMzwPA/w+KT3SttCaPvmuVb89rfHT/4DGXGeN+lwbAj/6f3oGEc/GUH54rXOcl9zw4T FG1TpQeuK9wyvbL1Mma6QWG3pJ/klBV4jDWgygAWSFkktDqTTv7LfYiTn1qUJgZkdST9 V1bf1Ii5e035XjqlusirrlZHRy3XlkxRZtdxlsDwKeYuGe6MidrkQRxL4DIY9ATFj1Lx 0A70e74S8Hi2AVrfwV1H3OavVo/cBX8QoJwLgmzFMJjlNAnBoBN6bj0S4fHtF1klhvI2 QZWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692248271; x=1692853071; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=BE7BuFtBkki69cDwkuiuKGa0jc+dDtFlBm+zVAuQLjs=; b=UuJnpLd7FvsXHaJ8lRrGJwOSYYPnp73nCyikthGtnkO+Ytvq4Cq7snNUndU32fQj9p +Sg5Ruogp/+Yn178JmunMFr3zCI0s9Qzx86Xj+/uLomPYF6eamCSmYc4iICbWi/MBMV4 M3ktOdjgR3aaMxI0HJHPS6BA2Vxk4FZQEihvapqIdO1T7Cwnhs61wvmSLYlGCfoPrJum XnvDZcs2Gn85Lh7FfBx9sSU5O2QoQGmdRnCcAdLciEYbjy+/AvotM5Fgh9AlROVZUQcG Vn+7xXiz3PovHPGTar7F/bv7cMzSGtKg1lzrxRtgXZ4h62gEqlGe145v4buMMonWy5T8 3Cng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzt6kK5EaHhikYE0NJJVKja68NNKMxYDoRqgWLe+GltvI7mlPco K8VzlPoyuuKpzprteiXx7d+ZRJ6ku9PCg+W5ILJLqnFUiyU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFG3V3b9tbCJv08wKohFoWBcyYHF2E/1qWXnoLwMnO64q9RTtCNDMd77bkFRkFcDz6qjUEkvCsuQ2mZRWGhjv0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9447:b0:99b:dd23:4f01 with SMTP id dl7-20020a170907944700b0099bdd234f01mr1600539ejc.33.1692248271094; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 21:57:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Joseph John Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:57:39 +0400 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.176 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] IS able to login through web interface, but the status of the VM is marked as ?? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 04:57:59 -0000 Dear Mark THANKS Like to give the feedback, Most probably the issue might have been occured because of the loal disk getting over , reason is that I was moving some images from my old instance to the new instance, this may be the reason why this behaviour happened thanks On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 12:31=E2=80=AFPM Wolf Noble wr= ote: > that tracks=E2=80=A6 the =E2=80=98why=E2=80=99 still could use a bit more= digging, but I concur > that tracks error-condition-chain wise=E2=80=A6 > > oom feels unlikely coz other lower priority stuff=E2=80=99d break first= =E2=80=A6 > network loss? > > time issues? > > stupid high latency/context switching? > > could be a lot of things > > > [=3D The contents of this message have been written, read, processed, > erased, sorted, sniffed, compressed, rewritten, misspelled, > overcompensated, lost, found, and most importantly delivered entirely wit= h > recycled electrons =3D] > > > On Aug 14, 2023, at 02:15, Mark Schouten wrote: > > > > =EF=BB=BFHi, > > > > The message =E2=80=99Transport endport is not connected=E2=80=99 points= to a > fuse-mountpoint. Given that pvestatd can also not write its statusses (yo= u > see question-marks, that points to pvestatd not working), I would assume > that the pve-cluster was broken. You should probably see messages in logs > from pmxcfs and corosync (on all nodes, I suspect). > > > > =E2=80=94 > > Mark Schouten > > CTO, Tuxis B.V. > > +31 318 200208 / mark@tuxis.nl > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From "Joseph John" > > To pve-user@pve.proxmox.com > > Date 11/08/2023, 07:03:48 > > Subject [PVE-User] IS able to login through web interface, but the > status of the VM is marked as ?? > > > >> Dear All , > >> We are using PVE 8.X EE , we have 8 node cluster > >> today one of the cluster , we were able to login through the web > >> interface, but the status of the VM machines were marked as ? > >> We tried to login in using SSH, were able not able to init 6 , it was > >> showing the message > >> > >> root@pve-4:~# init 6 > >> > >> *Failed to set wall message, ignoring: Transport endpoint is not > >> connectedCall to Reboot failed: Transport endpoint is not connected* > >> > >> Later on we did hard reset and the system was back > >> How could we know what was the problem?, which log files should we > use? to > >> understand the issue > >> > >> Advice requested > >> > >> > >> Thanks > >> Joseph John > >> _______________________________________________ > >> pve-user mailing list > >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >