From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <jjk.saji@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 729DEBA81 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 02:26:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 59B27623D for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 02:26:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 02:25:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id r26so2399176edc.10 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 17:25:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+bs+gqL7JejLaTrUE4gwpE32AEJ1dkF1FpsPzFv5iT0=; b=cUstNsgIBMbTYX1tuHTCyiCvRJXNSsknxLAbwuXFygpNzLU8Mb7uhoW9ehe6TvWI2U iZlAJNh3JzRFfqQenCxlSwGcW7eZEgsGs0EPcZQFBF6V+oPIcfLH+Zed/UXLw8KBFX5l dJLFMactzLDlCXnQKHZmZ2TaR1Kf1k0zXI3KSMFbGP42BAe7G6Qkg22ro/VQFFXb0EoS nXNVKZWm4nXyApI6SbvpJR00kdgZv/dkhlIGAuO3l4ctGupB/+NTBwrIM7H5c6vZi29F dSXzyXm91JVnFR8COlqANA6zZtNubbZumWZ97KVKlqEcMzVKEnWmbzKnAHa4oycMo2Uq ceUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+bs+gqL7JejLaTrUE4gwpE32AEJ1dkF1FpsPzFv5iT0=; b=rDly3tTPmxsK3/c75x/9LD45gC6gIOwzvR8o998grRKVVA5fMGoty5JZUEygjfyxHc y0t6/b2JdCPVi/1KHHk9Sot3M/nUTud+/eJUyfi29QojPnoHCPbV1OinSm4aKschh13o coc0OwUrpxxHdjSpBSbw2EBwyCN960R3W37bweP9S9i0nH8zqHISaH/zsCacRqoDeKDW xx557uIOBDTgQWYFxMCRk4LKPtgRDjV2EvkXQXtHUbOUOb4eYGBsq6MwuBJLNhDnurEE O2nk/4hhSJGaM1gUIrKXZWKj5niyDQDY36eaDa7u7Q8bkjUjRJk2pIs8huW5H0rr/v/I rOzg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkJKDJPolpgmFyGGB/dEZ6Yb0MY1wgY3Cr84IIk4WX4Ujf4r5kd xsP7cTuPhqY8cSThCjFTQLkRFlb8wzyDw+iKG92AmG2X2Es= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4xIO55PDOdu9CrTA0mcEVJ7uo7ueyKZw17+6rOTb3wnOFThkSu5SQHw0B0CJv5tCIEf44Qc5mC2T9mGVpIIbA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:370d:b0:462:1a67:75ef with SMTP id ek13-20020a056402370d00b004621a6775efmr15652812edb.16.1669339551613; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 17:25:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <CAKeuxjBVvTpPdBtZWFWj4h668qRHjj2hWipiTBCM1CCAgpVQQg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.105.1668758104.284.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> <e59c908a-2364-054e-20f8-1a230cbcc1da@c2n.upsaclay.fr> In-Reply-To: <e59c908a-2364-054e-20f8-1a230cbcc1da@c2n.upsaclay.fr> From: Joseph John <jjk.saji@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 05:25:40 +0400 Message-ID: <CAKeuxjCTuOxvij3xgbLB_Wquhj=a45VBZr0ZfGuPm+zo=Hp5nQ@mail.gmail.com> To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.040 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox 6.3.3 upgrade [ Out of 4 node cluster, can I only upgrade one only to the next stable release ] X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 01:26:00 -0000 Dear Alain Thanks for the mail It works for 6.X , I tested I have now 4 clustered instance , 2 of them 6.3.3 and 2 of them 6.4-15 I have done migration testing from 6.3.3. to to 6.4-15 and vise verse Like to add that all this system were in 6.X range I have not update to 7, will be doing it and results I will post to the group Thanks On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 1:13 PM Alain P=C3=A9an <alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr= > wrote: > Le 18/11/2022 =C3=A0 08:54, Mark Schouten via pve-user a =C3=A9crit : > > This should work just fine, at least for a while. > > I can add that migration of VMs between the new node, and the old nodes > will not work until the old nodes are also upgraded. > > Alain > > -- > Administrateur Syst=C3=A8me/R=C3=A9seau > C2N Centre de Nanosciences et Nanotechnologies (UMR 9001) > Boulevard Thomas Gobert (ex Avenue de La Vauve), 91120 Palaiseau > Tel : 01-70-27-06-88 Bureau A255 > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >