From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62C8C97CF for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:06:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4085F34BF7 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:05:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:05:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id i10so10575519ejg.6 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 22:05:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fMQUYcbp2jaQPZO3AFSH1iyN7fUdt9+Nw0hibJ7yY5A=; b=PWc6Po4KfiE3D9QZ9qv4vcEGW+D3ZQtwNIXpUe0aXDCgwbxupPkZHrPDsrUIlxtCib byPzZkMQS6kpaKvXlDfSLj+9xalWcs4oVh8NXFDLXZBmaFVJ1DpN1PYpXW4Npj4jXvsD B1pkiXto77OOc+dKd4nRTyfgFAt5IeHqUrfBCxB5NHm7Oy20lVlv6euFZSfgXhz2T7TM ifUKz1Oi0jhq4XhpFd2QXct4QVPEDV7+M/e+8k3lgwPlccOlC79orYJF08BwhqN1TyPr qHID3ekBknwK50BvDuSk97Q46R2z/vYjENJUHaSb56j+QKbf1yyLAcBe+muQ4E/s+rAH r6yA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fMQUYcbp2jaQPZO3AFSH1iyN7fUdt9+Nw0hibJ7yY5A=; b=rEVj/vtWg/qZ23T0U/gSEjONN0Ckz2Wk668/IwYwP5scuN1eGZsLxuY00n6E2uUSRw 718DDt5aj8ZQR4RXI8EZ+IdAmWQEsulE+xKK00lLQawzFqGE07f14WfjxlOd06LAt4hE s1bX/RRJc00MFip44/wi24zJLCzXLf/QKyDxboAkjM17J6z+ZNP8cbGwvtzdtkp4TQx0 v9XprxNqSK0VMUbaGBWVQEagzApEAfz96+XmIfvpWqkq7dAFZhkOBzfomheJy2SLCLBO eg8oMHQod2kuz0ueK3cuMzNEDEl7Z2Y9l/utybNIG+QbTuWAb+YAPZaABSAwlJ4/a9Eb 1Xkw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnjxY1Ihht3+z+PBHizSpL+0jzYQPa1Em6wEZLPlv+jmpHruhqd JKKFEVdm6CSQXF332lQCaZomNX4wemTrSuqrPmeQCpVZNKU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5gyujGLfBLyXymDf26y7jcDX3xjTrdUweZLR0yfUnDRsVDJIbPKg8Udw3j2EJHXENeddsvSE7O2xw22X0bPGU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:dcc:b0:7ad:69eb:90c3 with SMTP id p12-20020a1709060dcc00b007ad69eb90c3mr4891571eji.285.1668751535247; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 22:05:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Joseph John Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:05:24 +0400 Message-ID: To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: =?UTF-8?Q?0=0A=09?=BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily =?UTF-8?Q?valid=0A=09?=DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK =?UTF-8?Q?signature=0A=09?=DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's =?UTF-8?Q?domain=0A=09?=DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from =?UTF-8?Q?domain=0A=09?=FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail =?UTF-8?Q?provider=0A=09?=HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in =?UTF-8?Q?message=0A=09?=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no =?UTF-8?Q?trust=0A=09?=SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF =?UTF-8?Q?Record=0A=09?=SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [PVE-User] Proxmox 6.3.3 upgrade [ Out of 4 node cluster, can I only upgrade one only to the next stable release ] X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 06:06:13 -0000 Dear All, Good afternoon I have a test environment of proxmox with 6.3.3 , I have clustered it. We have 4 nodes clustered together. Planning to upgrade it one by one Like to know if I upgrade only one of the nodes in the beginning to check it , will it affect the system i.e. the 3 nodes will be onb 6.3.3 and the 4th node I am looking for upgrading to the next stable release . My query is that will the clustered system work after the first node upgrade Appreciate your advice thanks Joseph John