From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 781D0B5D2 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 08:22:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 62A362AA2C for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 08:22:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 08:22:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id vv4so2244938ejc.2 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:22:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Di7ba8TZ+6L/FYYg7iiTGTujVn87wwRGqygAcCtcBXc=; b=RxuOWZehy1MRIkoAAHw4v+mdBf6rUWGSnkMX+w8cyRu/Xdi92hecDXxuC+apljxYtQ 03lOwRlnIqd1NjBkuZNi8rnopVLocrP28pjGOCanzqHU2EXk7x0hJ4J+wiZm4ZFAclgt dHQIlQTkuRydvHgVRpFdGKsyN7y2GU2d30FS74rDR1C7YosOP2xrBfKCX95LuYW7RI/F +FFrvZ8a3KWWSjJUBC5rGP13tN10qhyMV01h5T4TrewUxZt64BsIsibD2y2BIb1QFsFS 0dj0kWYPaMRYz4KhKDs8HX0m/aJRpTAHeQtqmG+QW1PHtztYJN3/JclI6xV0SWHvlp7k 5SiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Di7ba8TZ+6L/FYYg7iiTGTujVn87wwRGqygAcCtcBXc=; b=PQVvp36jR665emp0VOwYpQS2HkpLK9v/HFh2IrDfb3m6pE2ObDNwGdOCdl/ryLTuur Ep/epY24bRw4l40coodP7yd7aBwVsF4Ndw8rSFVZNIRbqx7PzWO0q5RymGcOG6Yc74Yv WBSqFlT/9EVu/cbxGBP4iy1sJPg4dpKDrBkVQl/kLHbafivMOxhjw1ICSWVwWlC+4LLW 5NuS56mFFAKOFgQHdy0dRECpMvBcBwOlrfZQ9wgFomZ1VpDN//v+GDCZvnW3jfc49Ne6 I7ugB4tfcUQofxYuE0yS+RLjxMVvgXkYxen48lYksN2iFO14KqZ2KLd6On+QJcxfpTnX 12SQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkrjQ1+6z1RxV7lEmbhlY2BtV7qI2B4Uo5ZBWqQeyQePxJrJAgX c24AuUdqerHzbB2SXZn1MtGCSA96F6N6rZgJCGyu/04b X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4a2jBbn2US/ZNPn1KkD81zTjS7pOlm0cmwhXX/WoCptg2x9scvrfP5+dH+fRGy4+5VEEETS8/wlRFpwPrsFw0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a397:b0:7ae:5381:bd02 with SMTP id k23-20020a170906a39700b007ae5381bd02mr25872738ejz.286.1669274570967; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:22:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Joseph John Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:22:38 +0400 Message-ID: To: alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr, Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.050 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox 6.3.3 upgrade [ Out of 4 node cluster, can I only upgrade one only to the next stable release ] X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 07:22:59 -0000 Dear Alain Thanks for the mail It works for 6.X , I tested I have now 4 clustered instance , 2 of them 6.3.3 and 2 of them 6.4-15 I have done migration testing from 6.3.3. to to 6.4-15 and vise verse Like to add that all this system were in 6.X range I have not update to 7, will be doing it and results I will post to the group Thanks Joseph John On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 1:13 PM Alain P=C3=A9an wrote: > Le 18/11/2022 =C3=A0 08:54, Mark Schouten via pve-user a =C3=A9crit : > > This should work just fine, at least for a while. > > I can add that migration of VMs between the new node, and the old nodes > will not work until the old nodes are also upgraded. > > Alain > > -- > Administrateur Syst=C3=A8me/R=C3=A9seau > C2N Centre de Nanosciences et Nanotechnologies (UMR 9001) > Boulevard Thomas Gobert (ex Avenue de La Vauve), 91120 Palaiseau > Tel : 01-70-27-06-88 Bureau A255 > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >