From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8A3563061 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 03:47:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8B49D29A8 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 03:46:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qk1-x730.google.com (mail-qk1-x730.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::730]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 333C82993 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 03:46:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qk1-x730.google.com with SMTP id z66so731476qke.10 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:46:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fi-uncoma-edu-ar.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=iLqzQawipboE1Ec/5ptWoXHtqSyq8pf97A13rn1g5ls=; b=OAu0Pew8claBVT1/HKFOX6KxJawFRyDl2VzBwHWFg45N5bfExWma17WuwzPAxumBcG WYBLOx/ItcgB1qlRApQUvneZ2KsJBmlHaHGUi/RD7/dhz5LsEIZvBOcGLWmcsnFgozjh 1NPkOMlx99gVMcQ4j/u8294whGxSkjhA8vY9MloABeUP9bEVpMi/WL+MdYvGeoRNbzy3 gsuoeXEgCnn0tRnoKzYyUWH5QyXsOPYZ9ZNsZ/6gs0u+np8DwA3kWs603AKPrTkAh5wh pmBuTY0ITcsPzm8/3HUjOvF37ZbYqY2vwYxmtc/7zSETlS7KzScx+YZL3EfZ6j9lGwh5 jlBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=iLqzQawipboE1Ec/5ptWoXHtqSyq8pf97A13rn1g5ls=; b=y52UOP5mhIkWhseOwNP7U3yTd3DWCe/hk4B0Ruza9VxasTw5OboV1y6nnCjbFbvi80 w2YgDiTqNIafMUVU1RKeAFze/8S6hsNQmH68fzXcmjSp72xiQfixA3a/878l23cpGiIg mVlofa0CJc6TaKZ27jtfayplM+EsnTuNV1jV87g6fhJeNY9Om1RcK1cwEa9zPC9tjEFN nYTk9ZY/BGJ1x3ZyXOdZ+t+3IhANjKaVP6V/gUUcpVwhRtiVYwq9rlwh//LGfsfwYa4m eLK68eJsOBkam1luLUVr/ue2QUI+lCPvMZUTIYk4ytN+/OXC4MUPWdkejgpHg2AAVCn/ XoKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uiYNVQQ7RStSke07NMlGzZbuNjU6rzY7mnRqoPzcCnhYt67zj O702aOqUpau4LFydn6Ut1ZdO7gYG1ycrCWXgeNcKHcVMd1dW X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx3gj+EdxlJbN62FC9Fs7h3s7pPuvEKTTdf1Myj1qiDIeEfvpCCZBv2HVKgw8aTwLuDTN2+IbRnepcB1MAVCQc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:8d5:b0:60b:a989:917b with SMTP id z21-20020a05620a08d500b0060ba989917bmr422365qkz.640.1645670796083; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:46:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "Luis G. Coralle" Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 23:45:59 -0300 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.515 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [binovo.es, proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Problem with backup X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:47:21 -0000 Hi, the problem was that one VM had mounted a non-existent .iso image. El mi=C3=A9, 23 feb 2022 a la(s) 07:42, Eneko Lacunza via pve-user ( pve-user@lists.proxmox.com) escribi=C3=B3: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Eneko Lacunza > To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:41:29 +0100 > Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Problem with backup > Try refreshing Web interface. All nodes are upgraded to 7.1? > > El 23/2/22 a las 3:03, Luis G. Coralle escribi=C3=B3: > > I have a 5 nodes cluster with proxmox pve 7.1-10. > > I have problem when I start a backup on a shared NFS backup storage, it > > shows the following message: > > > > > > Some errors have been encountered: > >> pve5: Parameter verification failed. (400) > > > > *next-run*: property is not defined in schema and the schema does not > allow > >> additional properties > >> *schedule*: property is not defined in schema and the schema does not > >> allow additional properties > >> *type*: property is not defined in schema and the schema does not allo= w > >> additional prope > > > > > > > > Has it happen anyone? > > > > Eneko Lacunza > Zuzendari teknikoa | Director t=C3=A9cnico > Binovo IT Human Project > > Tel. +34 943 569 206 |https://www.binovo.es > Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2=C2=BA izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun > > https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO > https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/ > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Eneko Lacunza via pve-user > To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > Cc: Eneko Lacunza > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:41:29 +0100 > Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Problem with backup > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > --=20 Luis G. Coralle Secretar=C3=ADa de TIC Facultad de Inform=C3=A1tica Universidad Nacional del Comahue (+54) 299-4490300 Int 647