From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 864AB60476 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 67EE5EED1 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6461AEEBC for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id m22so1525378ljj.5 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 02:52:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KJg34Oq+GlAo/RNG3rtpWHsuAtRaQor47at7trVtjF0=; b=Mp9QxVTxSaxts2NtxTeih5AR2Ms/iMnGkCdsiINeqbnkxRfBxkk5uRPrYE4qqOOBI6 D9vFKCPD+m0LaHau8LJX56OmndFGJqXRBObasEhtpLfAHkxc1/sea0ThkMBPnDD8YGjV kNd0CHoGjOrQRpt0OC6t+119Iqoy6Q6qGW81XqgFa628Db/vY1QgDqj+9wWTWM2K08Qe Z1yB0XSupUbYJmlT/eGa9RmoWxF7g94EKEbouzMuiDvYNcp25rq7pqa4Eqi05O54094m 8ElygTsQLln8/7JftBupwTip8sFIX4YXtkl1Noi6t/CYpY/mIXKrNh1LnKpI0txJA280 CfTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=KJg34Oq+GlAo/RNG3rtpWHsuAtRaQor47at7trVtjF0=; b=QHvIjzZMxFCOfWSf5sAHJ8DOMjWRUo+o+xIWwNi1rF4Ggea8N7On9KPK8ix1BM8Ujl dmGu11WHJpS951R2kMrEwpmy33C6mTx8l+CydtnhAeS/GowvESnG7/9WEmFjUwFUw9TZ eS3HJjT7Rk+6AeJJTzE9HREq3/tKETvFuSl/6e8iD1USCHi1MVxXtO6cAVuuN1Kp1IbT pBcuP3e4v942+xnFe4UFYtoh77qVeTNjQY1sW1NtEipo4MzqKR/oIHnXOKZj5U+er1vF ZlpLjxUq44e1T4fu0DTsB7L2Cz6gt299bNyB3WMOnvcfw3aVTJ8T6JOzB0vfUbym8fCj AMbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iNETnb68EUXxiA6vtwpnVOvK0T+sHWS/GtI8IXMhoK/BX/k5s U0OKWKKkFY9nm6PKoWISjfeOcxBonCqqovcfaJjK5B42PITzWg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyuITjkfHyBaeuB80iDQWfUiCS5+uiUniCByczlq6NKm2Fm1v7VXi2sljKF0yQBiJkKKQnlt8n+GU5ESiw0/as= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b4e1:: with SMTP id s1mr4716791ljm.433.1597225919285; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 02:51:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5f048801-ccb1-18ec-bdaa-86b8425ea9ae@aminvakil.com> In-Reply-To: From: Yannis Milios Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:51:47 +0100 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_SHORT 0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [ix.io, proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] LVM over ISCSI issue X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:52:08 -0000 The fact that it was successful at least once with the discard option disabled is a progress in my opinion. Did you ever have a successful clone job with discard enabled ? Also, the error seems to be different in each case... with discard enabled: qemu-img: error while writing at byte 1990201344:* Input/output error* with discard disabled: qemu-img: error while writing at byte 2147483136: *Device or resource busy* Can you check also in dmesg for any clues during each case ? Also, when was the last time this was working without issues ? any changes both on PVE and NAS side after that ? Y. On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 09:12, Amin Vakil via pve-user < pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Amin Vakil > To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:42:10 +0430 > Subject: [PVE-User] LVM over ISCSI issue > No difference, totally random. > > Also here are the logs of clones in case I'm missing something. > > Error, discard enabled: http://ix.io/2tXB > OK, discard disabled: http://ix.io/2tXC > Error, discard disabled: http://ix.io/2tXD > > > Just out of curiosity, can you temporarily disable discard support on > > the > > target VM disk to see if that will make a difference? > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Amin Vakil via pve-user > To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > Cc: Amin Vakil > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:42:10 +0430 > Subject: [PVE-User] LVM over ISCSI issue > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >