From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFCA860F5D for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 17:46:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CDBE51EF03 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 17:46:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oo1-xc32.google.com (mail-oo1-xc32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 103971EEF9 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 17:46:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oo1-xc32.google.com with SMTP id z13so1232074ooa.5 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:46:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4dONCb23odBOzaFrmzVPY/K0H2VQpMjHVfTS1GVXPrQ=; b=QqxtsVS5zOeqNMlQ34szmFkHy7LTq4A/v+zXJ6HK/EPnqjQ1/kV5qfDKqOonSHeu9K LOwpKZtgiUCY2/ehETmYSX0Tsa/754qFFp6pIPcbJ5k+jmniCMb7HIG8E8srDJ+VLqBp xFj/gsGnWGrDEQNOEt9Wrsk8aswlvMr1H8wzFfw2QMTLbxMEkdHaQBW5mlpIU10YkBRp G7eZmPdXQFAjT7jCUaIBkE7IUngxEvne14uonA6AazI8jIFhZUchansrQoIqsN8XGY1F dj10UHiYj1D3mSqz2I7tX/N7N2KcQoqPOWY/Xya+wqeYJTn18dRwFyLYHn4xJjPDZEnJ BhsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=4dONCb23odBOzaFrmzVPY/K0H2VQpMjHVfTS1GVXPrQ=; b=uKP68VwwDYa/KKTUrOF7mfeLuGD+qPEd5+RTqAcSzXD4fRDa2anQRarWNWHjjyCJ08 S3cpC6tx2SFCJjWkAiwIg2eozkGsx/3cyZ+pO/qzmKPEyLWafRDtjq9Stn/syMPOTrrg XVxoj4sztxo47m55hbSlLXDlJgIFHWDmH3RxtTjf4b7CjB8Qnqvg+8s340rKaa35NyFd /xaNzS/pKkJER6ClwpYhsnBeMVDt4DRoKtH7dKJ0isgXDoWkaCJ+rVKrAfRulrjFw0iZ Yg34Jtk835uEuZYJ3VqTI+arlCxRfy5StMQL6r4yZZa/8mJ8ZweRCpD2Ub2dVPGdeuQ2 Dq0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lmN6Cz+KdtIJkrnGQ4R1m2Ey2bKI/oGfX/8sqcmImm/L1wfBQ LP9xduKG1zcPVv7v0saheOKmUXQR8mEtArhuMXkIZ3R71zorLQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6TnqABm35u+t60HAfZEOtQvFhP0axmc69j5UaZewuMmAIItmTdrSoU4AqldRdcroILQAisQLSuUJwvxaeLzE= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:d641:: with SMTP id y1mr6484470oos.30.1606495558398; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:45:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <930e1177-6137-aa49-718c-04f4fa74e975@lirmm.fr> In-Reply-To: <930e1177-6137-aa49-718c-04f4fa74e975@lirmm.fr> From: "Marco M. Gabriel" Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 17:45:47 +0100 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [lirmm.fr, proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Python problem with upgrade to proxmoxVE6.3/ CEPH Nautilus 14.2.15 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:46:36 -0000 Same problem here after upgrading from 6.2.15 to 6.3 on a test cluster. But the problem disappeared suddenly when I upgraded Ceph from Nautilus to Octopus as well. Not sure if this is the reason why it disappeared and I wouldn't recommend doing this on a production cluster while ceph is in HEALTH_ERR. It would be fine if anyone could test and confirm that an upgrade to Ceph Octopus resolves the issue. Kind regards, Marco Am Fr., 27. Nov. 2020 um 12:54 Uhr schrieb Jean-Luc Oms : > > Bonjour, > > Upgrading to last Proxmox VE / Ceph nautilus from the last 6.2 proxmox > VE seems to introduce a python 2/3 version problem, dashboard healt > stops working. > > root@ceph1:/usr/bin# ceph health > HEALTH_ERR Module 'dashboard' has failed: ('invalid syntax', > ('/usr/share/ceph/mgr/dashboard/controllers/orchestrator.py', 34, 11, > ' result: dict = {}\n')) > > This syntax was introduced in 3.6, and using strace it seems python 2.7 > is used. > > Any option to resolve this ? everything was ok in 6.2-15. > > Thanks > > > -- > Jean-Luc Oms > /STI-ReseauX - LIRMM - CNRS/UM/ > +33 4 67 41 85 93 / +33 6 32 01 04 17 > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user