From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19D181FF164 for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 19:20:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 16DC49A5B; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 19:20:04 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1741976393; x=1742581193; darn=lists.proxmox.com; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jaS4eY/AXO+UxtKTVEyAcM7oSlTKYDIg8dsJYZkThKI=; b=V2v9cHYiimXKmzm9J5fF0SXg1bdlGCObvni1Z+h2KhUFO4QZqnCHXph1vX2e06pHCx P/5SyQ6rWHbxQAm6VBViu655n9Z14BgiBD+zx0MvEt7bSG5BiXej6s3kDwxELtpakOSC e/uWU8gp6k2J53LtFAUAUlfd9qQbpwFZTdcavxdrqm5eyC9bI1tLVhEwH/jLxoykLS95 MwHBTA0srglsAZADckKqii1U4ue5oO9CL0DM+cdpc2O8L/XCx2iRWUmQRGxtYP+OuAKH UYcX0SgdxLuNMiGxb0vedoRH9HT6IZ59BCeFLnUFRUQuIP0W95Yw38HlylOyWGzvl18E b2zw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741976393; x=1742581193; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jaS4eY/AXO+UxtKTVEyAcM7oSlTKYDIg8dsJYZkThKI=; b=EBAiup2zxCrQEld83BJvNASy1U6U6yFUjn6ch3Ari6UQEyIhGpOJ349L0jIN2eCn32 oLy1GpM4od49wHGp7735/bqerBOoUiVGJuL9gwHcoRFzL/6bpVyLxDEd8lqRhhd4Unm6 w6NtxlQLiU+ElPkEEiP3cq37xd0ih5roMXePqbL3j6cGaV1II/KdptmPUhD2DOIF1m1s LtwhD281kniUTW+4lJjTFAww7QxsDd3VgTi9Tbp49RJRl7LfZwVnG3DzjPO4ZK3bsY7Y k1eyBezrERG4yZYwnI/EtWWjS2/jKzgy4PqBzybRPBm+I/5cAXRlGmzeNCGbdsRrUXJZ 14HA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy3EaPyi7M/CwD4LD8NxyTYmJv9RxK9iwFm55iHA/DDg1g7hzfZ Mo6nAYD7o7AyJIkFyLtcGCfJ3uO+Dr9oVqywH37h//DzMjZnB6Ta9sT+FwKtvOZ2wL6xp0C3w5J xkqlr1XjLOQfqsT1CV+EDQhLB0htPng== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncspRO1CI0RtNkXtEhQ9ubtjBlGWQezcSHMPUxjkvVcXeLv9xOIsbzQCY3XXL+o nP/DilWUtheZcEUxXRNAdPN/u8DvYnrv9OZ/EpWW0CeuA9V956hUcIOR1hvhJgFJ4D4yBVfLBab hGyzFEB013OQxCRuUZvE7Uqi0XQeQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHLR+EpVw//tA1rkMQN7qc/J231RUOEQ1Wp1P/sdvyqbUplX8zuaHTT+a6APuJdTpWJ56lVIUM8b+n0p7lctEk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1fea:b0:3d4:27d4:f76 with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-3d483f4e992mr29816715ab.7.1741976393360; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 11:19:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <CAEaLa5H4nZbR-O4uN=4vqbQyJqshgSytYD_DVOMnhqBRvxy1Sw@mail.gmail.com> <743e060c-b095-4155-9fa7-1d086520a21a@anycast.cl> In-Reply-To: <743e060c-b095-4155-9fa7-1d086520a21a@anycast.cl> From: Cyrus <cyruspy@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:19:41 -0300 X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JoqGmxUILIKSQMUVYuiwHyH-OgciR5jmjYf49KE1rLi4rODeeR0Z8AJ1dM Message-ID: <CAEaLa5FGttrRCTSU-0up2v=XUBfpr7vORFr7O0q9jqVhfpvbZQ@mail.gmail.com> To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.092 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record WEIRD_PORT 0.001 Uses non-standard port number for HTTP X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] API redundancy X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Hello!, Yes, I can do it outside with a reverse proxy. The message I'm rescuing: there's no transparent HA included out of the box to cover that scenario Regards. On Fri, Mar 14, 2025, 14:59 Roberto Alvarado <ralvarado@anycast.cl> wrote: > You can do this with nginx or haproxy, using each pve server as backend. > > > Saludos > Roberto > > On 14-03-25 13:59, Cyrus wrote: > > Hello!, > > > > Understanding there's not cluster IP (failover), how do you provide > > redundancy for API consumers when one node is not accesible? > > > > (User configured with API endpoint https://pve01:8006, pve01 going down, > > pve02 accesible) > > > > Regards. > > _______________________________________________ > > pve-user mailing list > > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user