From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E23D61FF161 for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2025 12:04:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4EF2B11030; Sat, 15 Mar 2025 12:03:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742036628; x=1742641428; darn=lists.proxmox.com; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=r77/1aS20PAc91BF0T2+05+lOOhZihjViYGvyYss/14=; b=V7qk64LGNz9Igo6mxQVYDBl3qDZuGIB+h6P7tsS8yF0zUXACPPLwwXmD9r19Q5Q09F vdqJYzFdZ/CPbAHQvWEh1oCOJ/bB/6VEV6LdsqvXHVt6RQo1ASum9P6lOZrDOQGbmQUd joIchvi/GlmuulTY9s/MYWggll2DmmmgXflVyMJ70mFk0oypnF9gX1oy3lv6TSbayHxQ JMk5UVyBfohNDoDzvzT9DTUymyTSiqDaUX+gSdW/zm+R1vlv1IWrA1KJ7/Eufno/SaVT 4bFUbIRIFp5pRyUHR2cLVMzyMuCsKnZdah1lJE8Dj6TF+VqYzdrpxOywtgCNEewuYmv9 FixQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742036628; x=1742641428; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=r77/1aS20PAc91BF0T2+05+lOOhZihjViYGvyYss/14=; b=mtvp1D7GJ6WGHQyM8Jul2l+NkYhAC5Pxdm0N3lytG9NlgjKPtnbm1t47KWt1w7rEuf XZQ+NTMJmEhQSpEzCDq03q+t1CtZoDNmHeYZ9BHdZQwc4jSVH/bLf6wQO0/WWFvcr0d7 Ef2bhCao86ipGe5hji7uhPuVBAxrlSQwmjJWSqr+4JjgtiTkQWR+xXR6SOifxaSpByvk b3Z1nkd1CZk+o2NhG38OzNKMEzjnWkkYTvhEmqKUmNQldxLJf5ppo8k9i+C11loXHqqv GBVYYx/Lbe3NI/znjXyPqvYAsRp/FR5idUSYmwzGNX+ZAxGSMBe6ubOkdjNf+y/mlu32 pRPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzqpye61Rw+ACmjr6Kzecc/VtZJjBHZIMvo7Ooct5toXTP2Qt3x LTw1y+z/vTpv4SSLpIPBxzmrytLF3DADYciciZlqNLeUQccJWaQLf2m/21IB2A1T1rCaIxrvT2o AJhZ4arHnLwu3eI3zlb9eIEwZuU8ZDw== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuDtWVrHKS7cjT5SPBVBDOJE/fsNrobO3rrjuEDRNSH7czNNeira18MPn0R2oi G6TjX1ZJjuaolPL+DZoe+uYrsPsc8Phu0VS5kQYkScLLBxkQqInwU2TYCXbmVeoNH77FHGCPKoD ke+ivqJor3hqXhzhiV1xqBwPpSEQscusXMDWzgRw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG0gHuNgkIxeWyPaKx1LFq4RMgx0htGemHXYgm4cZPnq0m9q9og6aPeTH8GOK7IvdgvdWwwFAIhXHKfsL3DT44= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:20cc:b0:3d3:dfc2:912f with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-3d483a0f58fmr53669835ab.7.1742036628436; Sat, 15 Mar 2025 04:03:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Cyrus <cyruspy@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:03:36 -0300 X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JoqZfeQH87Wf623-r4h2V7Z96C6KD3khtmUu7todEmbbPFEb__JvhK9aRw Message-ID: <CAEaLa5F33fWYksgDQyOwGPb9PYaFs9oNPsC1L7XSkDZ7xBBEhw@mail.gmail.com> To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.117 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [PVE-User] VLAN to VNI translation X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Hello!, Before requesting something that might already be there... Is it possible to translate a VNI to a VLAN towards a VM?. Use case would be: 1. Define various VNETs in a EVPN zone (might apply to a VXLAN zone too) as currently supported. 2. Define an optional VLAN tag for a VNET 3. Configure a port facing a VM as trunk (vlan aware?) 4. Deliver the VNETs as VLANs to the VM on that port. I don't want to transport VLAN inside a VNI, I want to deliver VNETs as VLAN to a guest which will be handling VLAN tagging/untagging. All the transport between PVE VTEPs should be kept as is implemented today (VXLAN). It would be VNI to VLAN translation or VNI/VLAN stitching + trunking towards a VM. Expectations: adding as many new networks as required to a VM without adding a vNICs, with other VMs participating in such VNETs in access mode and without touching physical switches (VLAN zone) Regards. Cyrus. _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user