From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E07277D486 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 19:13:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C432936AF4 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 19:13:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 19:13:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id r186so16962795pgr.2 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:13:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=EmiSrJsbtFIdTwF1+v5D6NrcdnmfRFxUdHGci/dkSe4=; b=Wp5G7gS/ShJxxB4CdF7RUPXs1sjvlzHfPIjQlaVRm2/6bz5mlRopD0yefQ4ehdhZy9 AwtTwrbmiyso/1j9KIcn7U4Mg7IIAAbL2riFIsiNMK1/WkWMgs03ETdz7RTlU2p8moHV ujzJay8fPJ8v0MSfxPHfpHLmJkf70a+C05ivzCnLCMdksxtbF+EjVHS5gsIpfIOTflot 57gu/cFowERmUK9qtYbaK0sZJ7sG4dUcd9JS2AWpJJKY3nUsX6aqEDohZWI5nFJhBNY9 jw6p7s/WyCsD7SYb4/7vgE1eNqz2frqzo0uzkzYyVdnfhXMLt+J+clsbPtPgq1FcFDJc uPnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=EmiSrJsbtFIdTwF1+v5D6NrcdnmfRFxUdHGci/dkSe4=; b=vUvmyaWiSfF4YjOYrKlu8C+3URqhAEcGzps7+C8RJsvZMBlQf5ukcpCGFAZ6gnMXO6 c+e1DwnrL/0FOEzSz7+skoVWA2wPeSdzvX9dw3SNgshZhF6NDm7WqvgoQ2l2qBaNfEI2 O2OFN9vsPXLhwEOw+LyvoYE1R6VgML7GdJq/N8Go0xlSXnoTSahh40y4j08uARYV+54J hJTuvK/USvqJkvydRJGryg0hmxOTU1nU0eaIx6K6Fhy8Mai2Lf5u1x4fHOIsIQzjL9Rq dN1h377281lfb5hmpcNLMH99vux6WyPE7mJiq3Fz8RCir+7SSTio4EHbtXjnWnz2vdrR cxcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8Oo5q3qGucA3UKL8zEloQ4VH++wqqmXltc+CJT1sOwmYqTvVYF vKMVjoU/mKp0TZtPAWRnmoDymYEWxU1iPIx57pYtFXAGwyM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tWgyYUTGuGVWMUPBcHza4Qxi3oSZ/O7bazgUzLAvzFxsrHYCBtnZ+QYLwpAipRGLHW/sqHNqdQLm4IhedvbVI= X-Received: by 2002:a63:fb52:0:b0:419:cb1e:6e2 with SMTP id w18-20020a63fb52000000b00419cb1e06e2mr27681506pgj.356.1658337196652; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:13:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: GM Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 18:13:05 +0100 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.452 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT 0.25 Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR 1.242 Uses a numeric IP address in URL POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] NFS Backups X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:13:58 -0000 Have you tried to copy a large file directly from the host(s) to the nfs server, how's the speed on that? Have you checked if there's a bandwidth limit set for the backups in pve datacenter options? Try running a single, manual backup on a specific vm to the nfs server, how's its speed compare to the scheduled backups? On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 at 10:12, =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A6= =D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=BE=D0=B2 wrote: > Hi, to all. > > In our PVE cluster have 5 hosts with ceph storage on all hosts disks. > > I setup backups to save on Synology with NFS storage. > > For 2-3 moths right now backups load very long time and not fast to > finish backup from all hosts. > > If we change the MTU from default 1500 on Synology and on hosts to 9000 > MTU is possible to make it fast. > > Synology and the hosts connect to the Fiber Optic 10GB switch but the > mtu on switch and on the hosts for now is default. > > If I ping to Synology from hosts : > > ping -s 9000 -d 192.168.8.23 > PING 192.168.8.23 (192.168.8.23) 9000(9028) bytes of data. > 9008 bytes from 192.168.8.23: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D63 time=3D1.03 ms > 9008 bytes from 192.168.8.23: icmp_seq=3D2 ttl=3D63 time=3D0.223 ms > 9008 bytes from 192.168.8.23: icmp_seq=3D3 ttl=3D63 time=3D0.229 ms > > I have the answer. > > When I test connection with between the hosts PVE connect : > > iperf3 -c 10.10.29.16 > Connecting to host 10.10.29.16, port 5201 > [ 5] local 10.10.29.10 port 51502 connected to 10.10.29.16 port 5201 > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd > [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.07 GBytes 9.19 Gbits/sec 1089 639 KBytes > [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 9.38 Gbits/sec 52 1.17 MBytes > [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 9.38 Gbits/sec 0 1.23 MBytes > [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 9.37 Gbits/sec 0 1.27 MBytes > [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.07 GBytes 9.20 Gbits/sec 608 789 KBytes > [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 9.38 Gbits/sec 45 1.09 MBytes > [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 9.37 Gbits/sec 0 1.26 MBytes > [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.08 GBytes 9.28 Gbits/sec 411 872 KBytes > [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 9.33 Gbits/sec 114 1.14 MBytes > [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.08 GBytes 9.30 Gbits/sec 321 676 KBytes > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr > [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 10.8 GBytes 9.32 Gbits/sec 2640 > sender > [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 10.8 GBytes 9.31 Gbits/sec > receiver > > But the speed to backup to NFS is very low. > > Can some one give me suggestion how I can make faster the NFS backup on > hosts (all hosts is now production). > > -- > Sergey TS > The best Regard > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >