From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3D6A9492 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:50:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CB04CFF71 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:50:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 25FB3FF4B for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:50:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id bq30so30209256lfb.3 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 23:50:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aua-ac-ke.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=eA2Wb+mBX1WVnf2Vl7535ZEEibFVAhVdxI9UcL8AY2Y=; b=z8tTQiDjnOVt5FIUOphiU1Y0rDnmR76TGPSljhPHjr1RUMvnEMzB0JJlyV3YfYHdKU 0B/zswtVdsgW6KYQJb7LF9eIEYlE4Vcb/PQdGsfUd+kUt6MtiXtiJvozs4SDAyfxyfH6 x+6bElXjoHH1kUpqd0Y7bUg8ndsgtau3VfGSeoweHMEbKU1ywn6f3p8nBwdkaP9x5QJy oK68zKK96UnVWBNF3U5L001LUp62jNogp4iPfwVj+ZeQ+WyhRzh4dVuGopeZ0aMSBXbU tzQx97/ZpAcBf8NcQi3w3uRDGaPLekEQsIhpZrW2mPnXojsitWtMonJ4eae8Jbikarwi QHSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=eA2Wb+mBX1WVnf2Vl7535ZEEibFVAhVdxI9UcL8AY2Y=; b=q9Yt1EKBZULbjwPt9JL8eFBsGrlB6SaQUK01GH8uvt27Oz6pKl9JERsaPSu50xxpys sq/NIFnSo4xxIvBswMdCpBLBjsblWkjCp3nBrAWa0lW7028f7L/TWIGczpKFGPBzBQfR Hw4RPgpAgFT/RqRNF4HkMw+pYIF5lysNMEM+5mN8tUOTizGx2emKDAs9e2qHt2HF9yY7 ouVA4SvuM7IsKZ0us61TbRCvyYzCzi9wz75N3mqtT7qXbW76dmLHDWDKXufx0t+LZXh5 69FgldR7Mg2I/V4gLEtqUmKq8KmW2BaoNaUkvoDFx23tj3cyDbr/5SLgrErjZI76CPG+ gB5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FTEpiv1PBfdxdGhVAMrUmewy7BpyxsPvOoas7CUfU3AkaUfKi KTRWSuiIm7NxKsQECaQpV8v9sBInSEdD4Vwh6Fx4gY9eMQSvRA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyW9Qx8lAcxSanpYpWNEQaTBJIDNhUW4bXwc471daSwlZd6FTWqnKjbxLm0ZdwV+EN0G9Szr34bAqMwvRHSQkQ= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4e8f:0:b0:471:fedf:ed81 with SMTP id o15-20020ac24e8f000000b00471fedfed81mr8848745lfr.548.1650955812353; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 23:50:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Brenda Nyangweso Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:50:02 +0300 Message-ID: To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [PVE-User] Virtual Hosts Cannot Resolve Domain Names X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 06:50:20 -0000 Hi, For some reason, some of my virtual machines seem to have developed a DNS issue. The host can resolve domain names, but some of the VMs cannot. The network settings of those that can resolve are similar to those that can't. Any clues as to what might be happening? Kind Regards, *Brenda *