From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9096D9E264 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 03:25:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 683FA146C9 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 03:25:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ua1-x935.google.com (mail-ua1-x935.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::935]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 03:25:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ua1-x935.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-7b625ed7208so2257918241.1 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 19:25:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698719147; x=1699323947; darn=lists.proxmox.com; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uGnDbN+fpMKu/kxzh931eHJfnJo/pIQT1TfTm0bCQ5g=; b=myMsmXSV8PwdLukznjsvmAp00RH7ST4AtqnRT/YEWDFVmm5LA6j5Qw4i4zUU0yiwE8 DSsOkAeqgF/AxAq4si87fSIL83hjepY04lLJRwqhnSSxs7KkfKVjGqD9oBxqZmloSTr9 DypA0aSAq2gVhxhC9vt7BXWAXNVYVuqDb9wvR4y83fKN691n2eecOGC5XmjVP40FuSsv RzTraknswcQh1Mf1dazSCqO/NB4boMwhwdgiRi+2v2J4oeRddKGoWx4CDFDQ5xeXZDru iYGfTVUbsKQAbQ5ShIk7FcPsmeFxXEiwIBPdNCT822Hs8/3d5zQvrEhnLbbJa3325lg6 w2iw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698719147; x=1699323947; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uGnDbN+fpMKu/kxzh931eHJfnJo/pIQT1TfTm0bCQ5g=; b=pA3H7MWszbapVdl9DIq8ZflNGfN373KdqfdVdNXvoqn4MlVDUHV4z2/JPYRX8IZJKM 6BjzJKiqFh62dYdMaoUD1R5EZWl/7TgOxP414B/CLkiB45Gs1S4z0rcKZUbKtPhC7Hbp HwZNo90C9xK11pwV46ZziGX2H6IDmR8USlK+Gbjt1zEpJxziTmiZthap8cCHlWponUkT FQT9Co+OQDKBkz/whLC6lZKEXnCiAZoh68LcDmsCExavCtOgJUoAj/Gs03leZAA8qeS3 sAER5RV62Y9+kXYwTjCsbGxzVJFcqgrrGvoOuz2ZiM3RQFNhIy5sBaqqt/g4VXm0E4qo aB7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw4n3b9h1z3p4CS3krDT1Zlz8nvOR6PdHdYf2f+1ZknWdiue0Yh 9uByOLaLdxfRsxmq3GfS32GhrTZoyr8dfFATovXRaDBM X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFZVErVC59D69ExptO3xKC8l6Ya2zAm++slR0c0fyT+LLA2PYw+q76PueggbXz4UhqSm4nKQobM9X/YDRTGqmQ= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e105:0:b0:452:b574:3ca3 with SMTP id d5-20020a67e105000000b00452b5743ca3mr8991135vsl.14.1698719146636; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 19:25:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Oboe Lova Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 20:25:35 -0600 Message-ID: To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 1 AWL 0.434 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_40 -0.001 Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT 0.25 Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider GB_FREEMAIL_NUM 1 Freemail spammy address HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [PVE-User] Still investigating connectivity issues X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 02:25:55 -0000 After setting the gui workstation IP manually and setting link speed to a different option I reestablished connectivity to the node but this eventually timed out. Yet node and gui workstation could continue pinging each other. I am pleased with console performance of the VM while it is working. I am able to ping the node from the VM (bookworm). It seems layers 1 through 3 stay intact between node and gui workstation but something above needs tweaking. They are connected to the internet router on 1 Gb ports. Next step is testing on node to gui resiliency with and without VM started - along with research on non default network settings.