From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cfytech24x7@gmail.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EA859E1C5
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 21:46:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 16A2E13959
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 21:46:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92e.google.com (mail-ua1-x92e.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92e])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 21:46:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92e.google.com with SMTP id
 a1e0cc1a2514c-7b610279c8aso2099660241.3
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 13:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698698784; x=1699303584; darn=lists.proxmox.com;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject
 :date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=Id0KhdodNpCi/Jqg5p13z2TLA5mJeWEeo9qmHWIAv6g=;
 b=f3iOEms9bGMwQCoW4ezsnmUZBflMP4UlGtI2Oj85r+k1chh5F62F3zvlv+2L/BFFcY
 1v9pp7OGD89Q73PflixfnOsQpL89DjC7OcRbJal1kRYIAZiQgu8f12EAcf3i510JYYC1
 CHRGVhXPxAUgiyonwg1LFv4gjaGrnIPJKGw92dpJ4YCTkyjuGITrFp7v7svu1PvlBdmU
 5DMtQ1v6UZTD45eFrMrrtqSyhkUyH89GWg1KcG6tXGb8+FmJCcadWOBrYHmvSI0B5/jR
 IoK1i68YdvLaWHvwHh65QorJIeqdoTvYGNeZ55+FAqOC5kivHmi758cjf0ZjSYmFaM+X
 TWbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698698784; x=1699303584;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state
 :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=Id0KhdodNpCi/Jqg5p13z2TLA5mJeWEeo9qmHWIAv6g=;
 b=A5oSw6SrIIrQZ6hxRPP17di04Fd1YOz0Zeis/KB3Ny0OaYs6QrY58qqHAGigN9J3oz
 ivf6+CU0ab3JR1Nkh1GElfq/0RhRHd54kMVpOn9eVJi6y68QhlnTuCDDyfOPnmTdANXb
 pM3MWwXwd9uJBaXSdP3o4CKG9v+CmNVpGUl+bm69I7mCFAE5Q44UP06PoJmAwdeIIG8n
 jb1YvtxxPgfkshSrJOc70RpfxgiQiBYjxmbVA/l0ENnxQa+i+EcY++ifP3HS+p2e6h1i
 SJFkLJvNeZeIYnf8MWGl9pdENINE29xvZsbwTVMMXIbYGiOxW8ZTlkX/EJ7c+nFeFTZz
 wD3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwOohFHG2WnYGMQkRlexHtxWf5mwSthWo9mouFEODRmEG0yQWT1
 0z6DcbA8iFdvwUfkJCIPmkvpRWZWsxV78JE8xW6gSYxebOI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF/9lbVXzux0AIUsC1R4971iz6DiBk2DNKMeWLqYMAKCojCVq2YDIrakm1dZYpBSJTWw8GV5Hsa+WzVcjjHAdY=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:c215:0:b0:45b:ecb:f62a with SMTP id
 i21-20020a67c215000000b0045b0ecbf62amr9993813vsj.22.1698698783706; Mon, 30
 Oct 2023 13:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Oboe Lova <cfytech24x7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 14:46:13 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC04G9h0iv6+tQ3-=StjZKT+xOaTZY=_zqZf8ELRDx-=JVi9kQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  1
 AWL -0.326 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_50                  0.8 Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain DMARC_PASS               -0.1 DMARC pass policy
 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT 0.25 Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit
 FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 GB_FREEMAIL_NUM             1 Freemail spammy address
 HTML_MESSAGE            0.001 HTML included in message
 KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 WEIRD_PORT              0.001 Uses non-standard port number for HTTP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
Subject: [PVE-User] Qualified success with 8.0-2
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 20:46:57 -0000

Your screen images allowed me to finally see how I do a manual upload of
any VM candidate image to the pve storage BEFORE trying to pick it as the
VM image in the web gui.   I was able to install bookworm as a vm and use
it to browse the internet via a QEMU console on the pve host.

But perversely, neither Chrome nor Firefox, which worked normally earlier
this morning now allow me to use the url to start the web gui to the pve.
I tried other browsers and they treat https://n.n.n.n:8006/ as a document
name.  I also noticed that google pushed on update to my Chrome brower on
my laptop.

So now big tech is invading my home to disable my tinkering with computers
on a an RFC private network?

Google has put a small notice at the bottom of my browse window and here is
a quote from it

"More about SafeSearch
SafeSearch is designed to detect explicit content like pornography and
graphic violence on Google Search. If you don=E2=80=99t want to see explici=
t
content in your search results, you can select *Filter* to block any
explicit content that=E2=80=99s been detected, or *Blur* to blur explicit i=
mages.

SafeSearch is set to *Filter* automatically when Google's systems indicate
you may be under 18."
I turned the filter off buut no joy. I think a post from Firefox is more
relevant; gone is the dialogue about warning of unsafe sites with no valid
certificate.  They advise they did this to hedge against  malware
vulnerabilities.  If I am in error please advise of a work around.
Otherwise is a valid certificate for PVE 8.0-x needed PDQ?


If