From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EA9F76017 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:45:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7EC64113AC for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:45:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-vk1-xa33.google.com (mail-vk1-xa33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a33]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A50F511398 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:45:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vk1-xa33.google.com with SMTP id az15so438525vkb.9 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 05:45:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tQZx+pmKkkKW0YTgqyu6hBU5S2eV/DdiiMRYsQdpG2s=; b=atFo1W66QYreDKHVP79ToIMaNY19NpYfwwQC6GHaPClU+Mc1g9j+XPWaohWdGGGn4c EFV44gAUp/VLwD1+KDwmKECOguWC3dXVoz3mJydMfcEAc0htONS8Kj2G39rJZy19voSv BPU2Tr4EJr9CY9wzKlxUWoYfAm2hS460V6CZFGZs9D4tXwiaz0fP//v6KJ87VpgTIfb+ 2s1ZGHQOhSKbdRiEmOKOmkAXgmA8DCLHCfQ1Ih8l6n4DnwcPolfkO0Gx4GM7VhPXGSp7 TDrvvK3Pw+y9vlIfji+9wmE8x+LfJQ5OZ1K4w1IMkCNcEvoDwcLMr+2Cek6ThPoGcOrA xhHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=tQZx+pmKkkKW0YTgqyu6hBU5S2eV/DdiiMRYsQdpG2s=; b=WgLomuIMtwZ/hsT+CuYkT5ZmVVIsA5fTUxJD5REGqZSREvSxphww+wgpg6Anty4/cn 13Ulh5EjnSclHKm3s5M0ELLblcTQKXUC23QIlklyqP//kUZy+4ELJBugR0q7Tn8RLLNm vnLHMpO21yzYBehfDConEKaFBRYsCSj/9UfWIgDh4hi59GKX8udygoteyRmk3mM8LQlY gCBHhZ1nW0lROW0nHA7el/xKLTeJlOIVU1XU5BuBrRyLxCCHguVQKTmdlRMenB+cIOLc 05iuYuxOS7k8cHFg44JQyzvT1Ad4elW5NzkGetD0TG3uhRgTO6taoLwW9r3M+UWjhfIf T5Bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530G5Un/7TgOjYmqZOGqX3CgQZgbbFHXNm5GaAcKQfBhFQaV1ywy i+RJOYwD/jjY8ihmJ/20VWEAICTvqZTmGecP1Up63RmRbGGK X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfmP76gx0cGJmEDpsuxf1UvfWHs/THo1O/6/TNi2s2J0wGdL4iMarpde4RN4QtuRf4SkcM2W7CD5maMCkg4Ew= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:4589:: with SMTP id s131mr11601643vka.6.1626266694126; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 05:44:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8242aca652161e867154eba4f9b5a65fa2ee9298.camel@odiso.com> <10e5b75a-0e2b-ed80-f188-38a9be4a5a14@tuxis.nl> In-Reply-To: From: Alex K Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:44:43 +0300 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.068 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox questions/features X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 12:45:32 -0000 Resending as it seems screenshots are not accepted. Regarding the *backup-volfile-servers* option when attaching gluster volumes, I tried to configure it from UI (DC -> Storage -> Add) as below though it seems it is not supported. I am getting the error: Parameter verification failed. (400) *server2*: invalid format - value does not look like a valid server name or IP address How can one define more than one backup server as below? backup-volfile-servers=3Dnode1,node2 This is useful when having a 3 replica or more gluster server setup. Thanx, Alex On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 2:01 AM alexandre derumier wrote: > Le vendredi 09 juillet 2021 =C3=A0 10:16 +0200, Mark Schouten a =C3=A9cri= t : > > Maybe easier to use the metric-server-service for that? > > it's more than we don't have some values currently, like vm real host > cpu usage. (including vhost-net process for example), > > or real host memory usage (for windows, when ballonning is enabled, we > don't see the zero filled memory by windows, so reserved on the host). > > My patches to get values from cgroups are already applied, > but they are not yet exposed in pvestatd. > > > I would like also to improve pve-ha-manager vm migration based on the > hosts load too. > > > I just need time to rework on this ^_^ > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >