From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AF1E7145F for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 22:08:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2B16229DE7 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 22:08:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-vs1-xe36.google.com (mail-vs1-xe36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 30E6C29DC6 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 22:07:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vs1-xe36.google.com with SMTP id i23so3140649vsj.4 for ; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 13:07:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nISvONWr7foNLJdNKo5nr78M2cvFWV7x0LTZkIzgohU=; b=qSag8fvxL1aMXWmvTTOaXSjyctgvEq7p6D3dcXOjpzdD5nt+PRUqAPYCasgjI/NvmO b+SRe1ErNN9WhKa9Qe6MiiNeR6jn8uXjiecqD4kmC+0JiMaUx/p5mbwICDcSZzDegxVi xA16GcBJIoLceTuMYHuI5T1rgaw9+d1kslkVulA+C49VNAruwyaRBh00QQHl43xBiR5B EsaW10CeBW7x1z3A73RdY++i/u3WJZYP8DYaOpsxc6YnIukTKmBLVC7OV3qv3CHSHXDv Befw8AFRzvIdCE9qQP/+YVVWXAlfJNFwamDf+jbPzE2flJ4X1uoG7uigRmUCMYtfIFrK 3xbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nISvONWr7foNLJdNKo5nr78M2cvFWV7x0LTZkIzgohU=; b=SDRqs5xdx0ytYqp4m0vdyjg+xLHFaauEAgTNi32duKex4A1JTXzH7Bxe42evCHimpf 83Ycuz3ivyD1WyrdkDFGqjmsehzTQ/m+oOt51iRVfrhYf2UfWeub9QWeq7/PrclPgTpW d0YFW033RxJFBFYxQXIWYe/tFHOlZOTe4g/1YhCdtVVQmXv8q8u6GTHvsUpZdYA7frBb xHko0Dzrz5TL7NVqsIkA3s343HSJguvj/S4QbQsctQ0C0rHYeIHra9ozsAESnF+UVTJE eNYOayx5jb18KmwQTNBUi+vpA5VM+PcbUPsVAZE8Xn6OwCtIY6DeWOLJbBV0gCim+DzP xvBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532OWWgs3IazqWIeflWz71EROBIGaWRhDuSYLw7aUf8mlA9BhqEp UJsU3GbyZZOFuO5IXhrr0qmpA637KYo/8nvGZt6tQF4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVQnJKoj/WrWccXwOYiG60NWsWitD/R1VYAx+CMFlfsYF5Q2uv1jW3u+lzoeqQW3H3qJebO61mZFREOPBLZt8= X-Received: by 2002:a67:3289:: with SMTP id y131mr3982787vsy.37.1631131670728; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 13:07:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Alex K Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:07:39 +0300 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list Cc: PVE User List X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.026 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] ceph X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 20:08:30 -0000 On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, 15:46 Leandro Roggerone wrote: > Hi guys , I have a 2 nodes cluster working, > I will add a third node to the cluster. > I would like to know the goods that a ceph storage can bring to my existing > cluster. > It brings high availability and Iive migration as any cluster aware shared storage with the cost of having to take care ceph. One advantage also is that you hopefully will not have downtime during maintenance. What is an easy / recommended way to implement it ? > Wich hardware should I consider to use ? > > ############# > > Currently im facing the upgrade from pve 6 to pve 7. > Having a ceph storage can make this process easier ? > > Regards. > Leandro., > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > >