From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F9D97497D for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:55:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 563342766D for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:55:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-vs1-xe29.google.com (mail-vs1-xe29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 12A3527658 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:55:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vs1-xe29.google.com with SMTP id j8so5657180vsd.0 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 06:55:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jfUuP2oVHdPqvRNJDuvUI6+JonNOyw7byvMk7/y3dDA=; b=fyBykLYhldy+ZVp/nDzeskhqfmSF9UZBvJCbxSzouI98du9DGxu70iA+/F25p/4PAr eI6e0nOvo9uMHOOQ1lO+/G6xCjTay3584HUpgLGUQja5dncpmcC+a4ENoO6X/SsIo9gG AG8ovg5DLo/nd7jFgz8ykS8aARxAj2Z/LMbRhXHkSbEFpYbiu2nDPpimsENCwUCoNG30 oARK4KnnjtwvikRz4eX4qpktnvxefMDHnY5BfssaWfqXAlBn3e9vUmoSuUd/cxtJre56 HB6rOiL0ayZ8w0gqXs5fCWCZCVA3G6gV4sh19VOzCYfXPbogRchcG9AlNAN2WLJAc9Ma D3HA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=jfUuP2oVHdPqvRNJDuvUI6+JonNOyw7byvMk7/y3dDA=; b=FYI2oM3cHEvUxD16QtLc8NSd7sCtjrdah8mXIYsnAtx608OUE2M8iyUbeKiQuPa8Sw j6WNidw3dcNJ8OT4e48c0yLrxuwDDhUD1QUkpF9MiXXu7HInYdDi1N0yfVMZoDbyEtf3 s7X/UcJIv5MDHEznCwIu1M4FNcIDFHXlTF0cc/7wwSkpFtsBJOTq3vAYiQZyWUvodMOn 0taHraJcLgmPRLUL9mwJLv/T0E3/b4LUymn7mxLbZAoZ7ccIcsl0tb3QbYtTtaG/NMmh fyPlNXUa3GrYhiV8f7cgtF3gctNUDa39VOcxCFQunPRMiZZA0ThcyE1mZ30tMCkXvY69 dyFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Onpea9jFHbNJgZ5ZPM22gaNEEsMrkXqjORS1V0vMRvfIHQPcE wqEPmgCpatS23I0LBoLG5D4V8E/ZZDY4OOZai4FjTOg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxpzUjid+tgbSBpf4hW/4OxkZzgEB2rJ6tI7RKBXZdhqwxkRauwC8YphiCr48RTWs4CC40luHF+Z2rGGGK008o= X-Received: by 2002:a67:b143:: with SMTP id z3mr3656172vsl.57.1625838893474; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 06:54:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8242aca652161e867154eba4f9b5a65fa2ee9298.camel@odiso.com> In-Reply-To: <8242aca652161e867154eba4f9b5a65fa2ee9298.camel@odiso.com> From: Alex K Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 16:54:41 +0300 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.028 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox questions/features X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 13:55:32 -0000 On Thu, Jul 8, 2021, 23:22 alexandre derumier wrote: > > Le jeudi 08 juillet 2021 =C3=A0 10:40 +0300, Alex K a =C3=A9crit : > > > - I have not seen any *load balancing/scheduling* feature being > > > provided > > > and looking through the forum it seems that this is still missing. > > > Is there > > > any future plan to provide such a feature. By load balancing I mean > > > to > > > automatically balance VMs through the available hosts/nodes > > > depending on a > > > set policy (CPU load, memory load or other). > > Hi, > I hade done some prelimary code with dotpro scheduling algorithm, but I > never have time to finish it > > https://github.com/aderumier/pve-ha-balancer > > I need to finish the streaming/rrd of pressure counters, to have good > values > for vm/ct real cpu/mem usage on the host side. > > I'll try to rework on it in september, but I'm a lot busy with sdn ipam > currently > for vm/ct ips allocation. > Great! It's good to know that this is in the works. > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >