From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5DDF61E1A for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:19:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CA8681EF34 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:19:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E9F051EF23 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:19:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c15so8447533ljf.11 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 07:19:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6HzyBW3HmR/imvWei76RNK79lPVlvSlrbPCPYkZ1NT4=; b=ektV4CQR2XU4UJQh/ZB4q+vY+RIhB2kJUTQt1Pdl4lM5JgYL0HuemBZyVgbvvcdbFG 2fzg4zIIY7POUucCu+iBMdP2NbXlTeI/XF8da3UYglMpLnXLoE/B7e9IodndR/F6Ri+0 c2r7covMmTslRdY3Jts73pvrYMlotNRxUkmi6QH72RJzdtSjv62wC3jgWG6wtTcxyl2s DzOiF1Xt/FDAIzyViA/HLgFLiA0C8Lk9HsRTSTcYQM9jSxg42JQxRH2q7horla2ZKaEY 7QWZ98YVjtriyqdIsJD5M9RZv+BIwRHBMJ9R3yVwWadmNeh3n2718m8RJjZ0QXj0tTIC C55Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=6HzyBW3HmR/imvWei76RNK79lPVlvSlrbPCPYkZ1NT4=; b=66h6okI7TtlwNNSgzvTlXRqEPNOjANuaPw5ESHlYHuoHAkdqeYlUaMNX6sakEE8Gs7 m5FAWLqyFz6kAhnQ67+VFyjwj6/iLFhwsiijtdkcZW7BLD56sjuIji6e4B03y3aaparc 7TyJIrBwIrvXIzGNDviwXAbLyOCNPqtmgCTefCb8ZZZW8x1+lmUNWUCjNdxKwJzws5mL d2A8Z/KdmVOroLRmL5zAyqD499zXavHwxLOnQTO/kUbDObwZK43B6wTWNhHOEBkGVGxv StVEetyTofyMlBhzqG6ksKZKwj6u/bCLnBOtVYjDvIO4P2QwDrKYxEj5Ed91wUO7skOe JbSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dANG1vz4x2uNUNhFurndpyM5686euLAkxE0ANtzG4fmkTEUhA QYhWCBCPg3xpGhQ7otckrBQMhmpa/wahjueWzfY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzBK/jQo49LOp4EvileCzj/IDuaLyLLviR8HCzMSlsAuC7QG5B+3SE7i6YW7NLrnyEYrCcwsJ/XWyc7RyDO2eY= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:bc14:: with SMTP id b20mr5166945ljf.6.1644506342257; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 07:19:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <075f6b81-6696-eb98-9665-214af1224d9d@t8.ru> <47ba4e16-73c2-22b8-1549-375b53ba59c1@c2n.upsaclay.fr> In-Reply-To: <47ba4e16-73c2-22b8-1549-375b53ba59c1@c2n.upsaclay.fr> From: David Martin Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:18:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr, Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.025 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Update proxmox X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:19:09 -0000 thank's to reply. Merci pour ce retour Cheers Le jeu. 10 f=C3=A9vr. 2022 =C3=A0 15:23, Alain P=C3=A9an a =C3=A9crit : > Le 10/02/2022 =C3=A0 13:13, David Martin a =C3=A9crit : > > Thank you for your reply, > > I will first put the system packages if there is not too much adhesion, > and > > then update the proxmox packages. > > I use proxmox GUI as much as possible. > > apt-get install --only-upgrade > > If I remember correctly, between 5.x and 6.x, there was a major upgrade > of kvm and corosync, which resulted in the disparition of node VMs > during the upgrade, that re-appear only at the end of the upgrade. > > And you have a new version of Debian when going from 5.x to 6.x, that > requires changes in Debian repositories, and then again from 6.x to 7.x. > > I would think less risky to upgrade first to 6.x, then in a second step, > to 7.x. > > Alain > > -- > Administrateur Syst=C3=A8me/R=C3=A9seau > C2N Centre de Nanosciences et Nanotechnologies (UMR 9001) > Boulevard Thomas Gobert (ex Avenue de La Vauve), 91120 Palaiseau > Tel : 01-70-27-06-88 Bureau A255 > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > --=20 david martin