From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7DB061C2D for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:14:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AB3461CB94 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:14:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B46061CB83 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:14:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id f23so10042647lfe.5 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 04:14:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=MGI90g4QIKyIG7NKk0VvbIg+aaE4c+tIDFvju34vJIA=; b=RrwiBTdKbs5RbHEbSFDtgZVkXn6bju5Ck+vZb4mNKw5Q/dl2ul2RQAgIHBN2E2DXcF KffS0RlidIHG8V9xQ94pqsl1CJ16GeH5bAa3klVMBxqcuVNO4Mp9KD/0D5eq6NTgZ69q GXHwbs6chQLen1t1AITvaCnaOY8MavCfq5UysUGYQ1x6mI7PSCdZox82yWw52FhYr+ak boVZ7AKykbPGR5+0DSLAylH9nfHWGJvOhLm3e82GeXheXGt5bc6iItVw4J04khadnj69 iQRhU7LzQk1CEgGKfd22AcY4APr1xGV+DwlAu5MVoIuWj2PjPevHFa9A424P8CWM2tVn zFVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=MGI90g4QIKyIG7NKk0VvbIg+aaE4c+tIDFvju34vJIA=; b=ytZtQgoQKYdjuLCeNrFw/PPxWTbZepNnkV/yIFV+4W23dXm+JUQC/KbqTkwT8bhJCZ dZUdS5tXWNwNRNTA0Zr3c80G5TPy9DDhMoM5UH5kwxua8S9CFeLdFz3TsOr1hYegVok4 harifr3NfCqewKYbSlU9MS2hn9xqfON3Ka0OP2Y6hN/ExwTx+uMhLOcCAy+7kXTN3wSb bgoubGwiIJabfV7tszXUfEcN+DDjhQuasY/PqVkLJXVkHSm/5gfW3DWG89jlyL7wlg+u DRNBPV1e7JZ5ebUfCdQpkOdXNSsKWwX8gF/3KK5ZX/E0UasDjdcCa6vQNMqTCEblGLAj QyXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325RJutv8ebD27YJSnyEX+/hvF1blewxO/KeXkVCE8n5jMNkq+t q5Ip8RkfcYg7JqvxX2RtPMbSTA271MovhxMuDB8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5qV51413FL4qwHrV+u7yzJFfGATNVDXgznQjjzPIz5tRyYSJ46JCk+5nWy2I9NG5PH7cKnZuzqFQTHM+ScIw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:308f:: with SMTP id z15mr4766122lfd.192.1644495242946; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 04:14:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <075f6b81-6696-eb98-9665-214af1224d9d@t8.ru> In-Reply-To: From: David Martin Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:13:51 +0100 Message-ID: To: Arjen , Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.050 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Update proxmox X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 12:14:10 -0000 Thank's you, Thank you for your reply, I will first put the system packages if there is not too much adhesion, and then update the proxmox packages. I use proxmox GUI as much as possible. apt-get install --only-upgrade Le jeu. 10 f=C3=A9vr. 2022 =C3=A0 12:35, Arjen via pve-user < pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> a =C3=A9crit : > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Arjen > To: Proxmox VE user list > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:35:23 +0000 > Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Update proxmox > On Thursday, February 10th, 2022 at 11:52, =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5= =D0=B9 =D0=A6=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=BE=D0=B2 > wrote: > > > Hi David, > > > > Before upgrade you need backup all VM or moved all to other host so as > > not to interrupt their work. > > > > After see this documentation Upgrade from 5.x to 6.0 > > https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_5.x_to_6.0 > > > > 10.02.2022 13:18, David Martin =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have 25 server's proxmox, and i need update one server who is in > 5.14-4 > > > version. > > > > > > Do you think if it's possible to update directly with apt update && a= pt > > > upgrade > > > in terminal ? > > > > Sergey TS > > Probably not but more importantly: Never use apt upgrade ! > Always use apt dist-upgrade for Proxmox > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Arjen via pve-user > To: Proxmox VE user list > Cc: Arjen > Bcc: > Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:35:23 +0000 > Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Update proxmox > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > --=20 david martin