From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <netravnen@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81F639DE45 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 12:31:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5C6B319C25 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 12:31:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 12:31:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-285a64dcf3eso159387a91.1 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 03:31:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1700911878; x=1701516678; darn=lists.proxmox.com; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qGb/Ij6NBGkm1eSoW7sAp+kjrBdNJsepbs1qHhKlOU4=; b=cBj6Nwnq83EEWXObfkxQ+fa0/RlumfDkf7QiMukL9WOpm8ah4wewwG6lN6WjGk2EW/ uxl1MC8jB0Qy92oBbaj1Tz0l8Uv3SoAX2rMbdmU9xZOUMQj8ftGPnHi4agZSTJ5UijTH ntMmUayF8XQDW6Uoc03sU4ZIa9k9tAJAIgigCpvcDdEii+5PRi6NubqQPQBMw1lUs+7L 0keL08QXn8z0jpyP5W0Y+SEYYc3ycROYRlPOSqFTRDuxM0x1Bz0HVHjs+zP9phsvLZUd bgZ+aHQsMzqAhcgVPZ9hngEeLFTrQE1LWm5TIOCXJVQkUP6pzoeo06qp8fd+eeRzQEV8 cMlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1700911878; x=1701516678; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qGb/Ij6NBGkm1eSoW7sAp+kjrBdNJsepbs1qHhKlOU4=; b=r+9AZPTqzcDZjTRQMtoN3l5opLLhe00fUR9FMJlDXTO82I6V+06+oA0zrUIJkXZfIB T8u7HklsDoZJFR3gBtwVjSqHzhsHj/1RcvKVxrx+GETBn7goByeT7h6NE7ZgeALs3ZIi nMzvrW80SBdyt5/6NTq6DDnoKRxQaYm+kWQXCz7RoU65G9KxdxVcGh9/c+DuDynwMhQK l+CPdhXzTN5F5SkC9kajN3aSpbfqF3UEC5PSQHm5tC8cHGE0MPbVbyQE+boIiO70bHfg 1rPt6WqMjc6lWf74iL1D4BZNx8Zxy7zOgd8DsWBLULiahf/tlJW4IZneXtNeDHEHny2I DeAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx2WPsWOr4ypdS+/qr1cB232Blz01wR7s+Y2LcBhpbpbh5NU2Ku KDaWoYfsbfrx6eO9fq98H5sERLMayYZODcVV4pc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFNP4TKCiV28aP5DF370l/wCPfJuLeKsEeJ9Q/S/r55aQzl8dJgcp2wDNtXt3aRAvAVYTIKdqcHTsAKFE0tSwo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1b4b:b0:285:b1b8:e29c with SMTP id nv11-20020a17090b1b4b00b00285b1b8e29cmr171014pjb.12.1700911877616; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 03:31:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <010b018c0626eb09-926dde36-25a0-4143-9fce-2fad62b12982-000000@eu-west-2.amazonses.com> In-Reply-To: <010b018c0626eb09-926dde36-25a0-4143-9fce-2fad62b12982-000000@eu-west-2.amazonses.com> From: netravnen+proxmoxlist@gmail.com Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 12:30:40 +0100 Message-ID: <CA+cYV6uZzy8uBjwjw2Tt4sAxppo369V=66WX6ouavtnuMCuxVQ@mail.gmail.com> To: quenten+pve@cringe.zip, Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.994 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] OpenZFS silent corruption bug X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 11:31:56 -0000 On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 at 12:09, Quenten <quenten+pve@cringe.zip> wrote: > 2. I want to know if Proxmox versions of OpenZFS are affected as well. I can recommend looking in the list archives at https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/2023-November/thread.html Thread: "[PVE-User] Proxmox VE 8.1 released!" > Does anyone on this list know more about this bug than me, in a more > technical sense? Are we affected? I personally checked on my Proxmox > install and "zfs version" returns "zfs-2.1.11-pve1". What is the best > course of action to take here? These msg's indicates the Proxmox team is aware and working on the problem. https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/2023-November/017308.html I read this post as "there *could* be more to it than first discovered - stay tuned for updates" https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/2023-November/017304.html