From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 284A068F30 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:57:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 145CE28BC1 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:56:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2AC1D28BB6 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:56:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id q2so17718498iow.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:56:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8WrbVV0mmUsWVS9JL1w+JclvvaUD0JSv5ad1lnrth0M=; b=GUg0kZSOSJlaEt2tn768p1oFKDuGvlTB6AKMbVwglQljtmHto8tlyF4E7aVH5KQKdZ z9b6N+POuDYbUyp2dHGqWF7b18hUnmCdTjztRjpez2Gg/4Cp0ITUtwgR/oLD1jkb7uyD 1zegbXSJV+70SfZXDBBLIXXZezqmu5aU3E1y56Elx2y/uz1hOA0Hu8YoNSIZGOxkjSHt 6pY2gIEW8DjMp+RoJsc5MShU+Y0+YHjWGImXmBlh8DTlZ3Wsw3GrRQxkpsiIIp97PflV 9YMcvwYNkiIry7XjLdAWnqWffB9FiQ0UWM+zqKXs3nlsIa1348+/Nh3VBK6DFS1Vmp+y /b4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8WrbVV0mmUsWVS9JL1w+JclvvaUD0JSv5ad1lnrth0M=; b=IVaRFmfUwuNJUzqLuOLrqs21nSQgJOZtvmW9R8fFsApdfGpZn1k4TiTmLo2ZF7XFys ux3rcVnVyq919kD6X3ub9MAzmJzoVpNudXIqgb3kxtfacGoYmWSmQhWFFDBpW9lHBGKb Nm/FS8Xqhl5in76nlmKsFfmMIuSL681lluYGTI/qi4EcL520tRqVCnL8sCFm+gV2bZtS r2UV3uImjs67s2eie/7Ss+0I2/t6rE2Rek9eEs2f9LfLGGfqCZR3GI2BSAoka6nT9MLN JavZZSt2q65m6lqcun8cetsQLcbxeS+3YiXx8g+qb3/GdAo3NFp0fV86F7ZoFBNUfhpX pAzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Ll47gbbIq4SGXkjc/C252x3anoqDW0vJzv6EWy2KBB7+gpETL f0HSMZkNGtAGpzpkrda6Okn6blbjrqX1PFOJX+u6xB6R X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+9T3JG1zHfBb2bRohO1vtaAty/9lZlgTB97i22lhGwIsFOJO6soZT09J/yEaFjJWnyQRE+8wxkY4hewN56dY= X-Received: by 2002:a92:bb0b:: with SMTP id w11mr11666361ili.125.1610729805586; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:56:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: JR Richardson Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:56:34 -0600 Message-ID: To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [PVE-User] Unused Disk Remove vs Detach X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:57:24 -0000 Hi All, I'm running PVE 6.2.11, I have VMs with Disks on NFS shared storage. I moved disks to other storage nodes but did not choose to delete the old disk, so the old disk is still assigned to the VM in hardware as 'Unused Disk 0'. When I select the disk, the 'Detach' button changes to 'Remove'. I remember in older versions of PVE, you could just 'Detach' disks instead of removing them. Is this due to the old storage node is still on-line? If I shutdown the old storage node, would I get the option to Detach Unused Disks? Can I get around this via command line utility to detach the old disk? Thanks. JR -- JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses Chasing the Azeotrope